university, showed that in the course of transition of writing from the manual way to the 

machine, semantic units of mental process organisation change (a word is replaced with a text), the speed of writing grows as well as the number of dynamic errors and errors in optical-motoric encoding. At the same time, writing assignments in the “manual” way by today’s young people results in the increase of mental stress and problems in dynamic organisation of activities.

Key words: writing, neuropsychology, students.

 

1. Asmolov A. G., Tsvetkov A. V. Rol’ pis’mennoy rechi v intellektual’nom i lichnostnom razvitii mladshikh shkol’nikov // Mir psikhologii. 2005. № 2. S. 217–222.

2. Blonskiy P. P. Psikhologiya mladshego shkol’nika. M.-Voronezh: MPSI, 1997.

3. Vygotskiy L. S. Myshlenie i rech’ // Sobranie sochineniy: v 6 t. M.: Pedagogika, 1982. T. 2. 362 s.

4. Zankov L. V. Besedy s uchitelyami: voprosy obucheniya v nachal’nykh klassakh. M.: Prosveshchenie, 1970. 200 s.

5. Pligin A. A. Issledovanie poznavatel’nykh strategiy dlya obespecheniya individualizatsii razvitiya sub’yektnosti shkol’nikov//Aktual’nye problemy psikhologicheskogo znaniya. 2009. № 3. S. 16–32.

6. Sadovnikova I. N. Narusheniya pis’mennoy rechi i ikh preodolenie u mladshikh shkol’nikov. M.: Vlados, 1997.

7. Tsvetkova L. S. Neyropsikhologiya scheta, pis’ma i chteniya: narushenie i vosstanovlenie. M.: NPO «MODEK», 2000.

8. Tsvetkova L. S., Pokrovskaya S. V., Tsvetkov A. V. Pis’mennaya rech’: budushcheye s pozitsiy neyropsikhologii // Nauchnoe mnenie. 2013. № 12. S. 124–131.

9. Tsukerman G. A. Chto razvivaet i chego ne razvivaet uchebnaya deyatel’nost’? // Voprosy psikhologii. 1998. № 5. S. 12–18.

10. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya: praktikum / pod red. S. D. Smirnova i T. V. Kornilovoy. M., 2003.

11. El’konin D. B. Razvitie ustnoy i pis’mennoy rechi u uchashchikhsya. M., 1998.

12. Yakimanskaya I. S. Tekhnologiya lichnostno-orientirovannogo obrazovaniya. M., 2000.