The article views the literary text as interdiscourse and examines mechanisms of
discourse interaction represented in postmodern texts. The article focuses on the strategy of simulated discourse change which determines a number of properties inherent in postmodern literary texts.
carnival topos, irony, parody.
References
1. Andreyeva V. A. Literaturnyi narrativ: tekst i diskurs. SPb.: Norma, 2006. 183 s.
2. Vorontsova T. I., Georginova N. Yu. K utochneniyu ponyatiy «diskurs» i «interdiskursivnost’» // Studia Linguistica. Antropologicheskaya lingvistika: problemy i resheniya. XXI. SPb.: Politekhnika-servis, 2012. S. 177–184.
3. Ivanova Yu. A. Kategoriya mifologicheskogo vremeni v sovremennom romane – mife (na primere romana Dzheymsa Dzhoysa «Uliss»): avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. SPb., 2002. 22 s.
4. Nyubina L. M. Kategoriya «stil’» v postmodernizme // Filologicheskie nauki. M.: Filologicheskie nauki, 2010. № 2. S. 35–48.
5. Oliz’ko N. S. Interdiskursivnost’ kak kategoriya postmodernistskogo pis’ma // Vestnik ChGU. 2007. №115. S. 95–114.
6. Oliz’ko N. S. Intermedial’nost’ kak raznovidnost’ interdiskursivnykh otnosheniy // Mirovaya literatura v kontekste kul’tury. 2008. № 3. S. 77–79.
7. Chemodurova Z. M. Igra v postmodernistskom tekste. SPb.: Palitra, 2013. 387 s.
8. Chernyavskaya V. E. Tekst kak interdiskursivnoe sobytie// Tekst – Diskurs – Stil’. Kommunikatsiya v ekonomike. SPb.: Izd-vo SPGUEF, 2004. S. 33–42.
9. Atwood M. The Penelopiad. Edinburgh, London, N. Y., Melbourne: Canongate, 2005. 199 p.
10. Howells C. Five Ways of Looking at the Penelopiad. 2003: [ojs-prod.library.usyd.edu.au].
11. Staels H. The Penelopiad and Weight: contemporary parodic and burlesque transformations of classical myths, 2009: [www.thefre elibrary.com/the-penelopiad-and-weight].
