The article considers the process of transformation of non-legal norms (customs, traditions and habits) into municipal legal normative settings. According to the author, customs as established rules of conduct transform most often. However, the transformation can face some problems that can negatively affect regulated social relations.
transformation.
References
1. Avak’yan S. A. Gosudarstvenno-pravovye normy i obychai: sootnoshenie v regulirovanii deyatel’nosti Sovetov // Razmyshleniya konstitutsionalista: izbrannye stat’i. M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 2010. S. 91–102.
2. Avak’yan S. A. Gosudarstvenno-pravovye instituty: ponyatie i formirovanie (primenitel’no k deyatel’nosti Sovetov) // Razmyshleniya konstitutsionalista: izbrannye stat’i. M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 2010. S. 80–91.
3. Golovkin R. B. Nekotorye aspekty preyemstvennosti prava po otnosheniyu k inym sotsial’nym regulyatoram // Yuridicheskaya tekhnika. Yezhegodnik № 5. Vtorye Babaevskie chteniya «Preyemstvennost’ v prave: doktrina, rossiyskaya i zarubezhnaya praktika, tekhnika». Nizhniy Novgorod, 2011. S. 129–131.
4. Drobyshevskiy S. A. Politicheskaya organizatsiya obshchestva i pravo kak yavleniya sotsial’noy evolyutsii. Krasnoyarsk, 1995.
5. Nenovski N. Preyemstvennost’ v prave. M., 1977.
6. Srtlyan S. V. Pravo i traditsionnyi obraz zhizni: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Vladimir, 2008.
