The article concerns the issues of terminology and classification of electronic communication types in linguistic studies. The author offers the terms “genre”, “format” and “service of electronic communication” for better differentiation of electronic communication types. The article problematises the relevance of existing typologies of electronic communication.
References
1. Bakhtin M. M. Problema teksta. Opyt filosofskogo analiza // Voprosy literatury. 1976. № 10. S. 122–151.
2. Galichkina E. N. Spetsifika komp’yuternogo diskursa na angliyskom i russkom yazykakh (na materiale zhanra komp’yuternykh konferentsiy): avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Volgograd, 2001.
3. Goroshko E. I. Teoreticheskiy analiz internet-zhanrov: k opisaniyu problemnoy oblasti // Zhanry rechi. Vyp.5. Zhanr i kul’tura. Saratov: Izdatel’skiy tsentr «Nauka», 2007. S. 370–389.
4. Goroshko E. I., Zhigalina E. A. Virtual’noe zhanrovedenie: ustoyavsheyesya i spornoe // Uchenye zapiski Tavricheskogo natsional’nogo universiteta im. V. I. Vernadskogo. Seriya «Filologiya. Sotsial’nye kommunikatsii». 2011. T. 24 (63). № 1. Ch. 1. S. 105–124.
5. Ivanov L. Yu. Yazyk interneta: zametki lingvista// Slovar’ i kul’tura russkoy rechi. M., 2000.
6. Kompantseva L. F. Ot klassicheskogo yazykoznaniya – k internet-lingvistike // Studia Linguistica. Zbіrnik naukovikh prats’. K.: Vidavnicho-polіgrafіchniy tsentr «Kiїvs’kiy unіversitet», 2010. V. 4. URL: http://philolog.univ.kiev.ua/php/4/7/Studia_Linguistica_4/024_030.pdf.
7. Lutovinova O. V. Lingvokul’turologicheskie kharakteristiki virtual’nogo diskursa. Volgograd: Izd-vo VGPU Peremena, 2009.
8. Makarov M. L. Zhanry v elektronnoy kommunikatsii quo vadis? // Zhanry rechi. Vyp. 4: Zhanr i kontsept. Saratov: «Kolledzh», 2005. S. 336–352.
9. Morgun N. L. Nauchnyi setevoy diskurs kak tip teksta: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Tyumen’, 2002.
10. Myasnikova M. A. Ponyatiya «zhanr» i «format» v arsenale mediapedagoga // Obrazovanie. Media. Obshchestvo: Prostranstvo sotrudnichestva. 2011. № 4. URL: http://rudocs.exdat.com/docs/index-152299.html.
11. Usacheva O. Yu. Diskursnyi analiz tekstov dialogicheskoy internet-kommunikatsii: avtoref. dis. … dokt. filol. nauk. Yelets, 2013.
12. Shmakov A. A. Bytie teksta s obrashcheniem v internet-kommunikatsii (na materiale russkoyazychnykh blogov i forumov): avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Gorno-Altaysk, 2014.
13. Shchipitsina L. Yu. Kompleksnaya lingvisticheskaya kharakteristika komp’yuterno-oposredovannoy kommunikatsii (na materiale nemetskogo yazyka): avtoref. dis. … d-ra filol. nauk. Voronezh, 2011.
14. Shchipitsina L. Yu. Problema differentsiatsii zhanrov komp’yuterno- oposredovannoy kommunikatsii // Vestnik Pomorskogo universiteta. Seriya «Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki». 2009. № 1. S. 118– 122.
15. Androutsopoulos J. Introduction: Sociolinguistics and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 2006. 10/4. P. 419–438.
16. Crystal D. Language and the Internet. Cambridge, 2001.
17. Foulger D. A. Medium as Process: The structure, use, and practice of computer conferencing on IBM’s IBMPC computer conferencing facility. Doctoral Dissertation, Temple University. 1990. URL: http://evolutionarymedia.com/mediumAsProcess.
18. URL: http://royal.pingdom.com/2012/04/24/irc-is-dead-long-live-irc/
19. URL: http://irc.netsplit.de/networks/details.php?net=IRCnet&submenu=weeks
20. URL: http://www.liveinternet.ru/stat/odnoklassniki.ru/index.html?period=month
