D. A. Fedorov
Price: 50 руб.
The article presents a critical analysis of the “scientific school” concept of Nikolay
Vitke, a Russian sociologist of the 1920s. According to the author, the hypothesis of
Vitke’s “humanistic” sociological views is untenable. Thus, there is no reasoned basis
for reckoning this author among the representatives of the so-called “school of human
relations” in social management.
Key words: N. Vitke, scientific school, sociology, labour.
References
1. Vitke N. A. Organizatsiya upravleniya i industrial’noe razvitie. M.: Izd-vo NK RKI SSSR, 1925.
2. Vitke N. A. Retsenziya na knigu: S. Strel’bitskiy. «Administrator» // Voprosy organizatsii i upravleniya. 1923. № 4. S. 232–233.
3. Voronova E. Yu. Polisistemnyi podkhod v issledovanii nauchnoy shkoly // «IV moskovskie vstrechi», 26–29 iyunya 2006 g. M.: 2006. S. 35.
4. Golubev K. I. Evolyutsiya teorii upravleniya predpriyatiem i gumanizatsiya sotsial’no-trudovykh otnosheniy v XX v.: dis. … d. e. n. SPb., 2003.
5. Gofman A. B. Klassicheskoe i sovremennoe. Etyudy po istorii i teorii sotsiologii. M.: Nauka, 2003.
6. Protokoly zasedaniy Instituta Sotsial’noy psikhologii. Rukopis’. Protokol № 193. Lichnyi arkhiv L. G. Byzova.
7. Ulitskiy Ya. S. Monograficheskoe izuchenie fabrik i zavodov. 2-e izd. M.: 1930. S. 7–26.
8. Fedorov D. A. Teoriya sotsial’nogo upravleniya N. A. Vitke. SPb.: SPbGIEU, 2012.
9. Chistyakova K. A. Dvizhenie za nauchnuyu organizatsiyu truda 1920-kh–1930-kh godov v sovetskoy Rossii: dis. … k. ist. n. M., 2004. S. 201.
10. Yaroshevskiy M. G. Logika razvitiya nauki i nauchnaya shkola // Shkoly v nauke. M.: 1977.
11. Gersh S., Roest B. Medieval and renaissance humanism: rhetoric, representation, and reform. BRILL, 2003.
