Based on the concrete historical approach, the article views the characteristics of
regional, historical and pedagogical material, which makes it possible to estimate the
history of Russian education in the period under study. The administrative arbitrariness
and lack of activity regulation were the obvious characteristics of the bureaucratic model of education management in the southern province of the Russian Empire (in particular, the Northern Caspian region) in the 19th century. The author proves that during the period under study the emerging education management apparatus in the province of the Russian Empire did not correspond to the classical model of rational bureaucracy.
relationships.
References
1. Burd’ye P. Sotsiologiya sotsial’nogo prostranstva / per. s frants.; otv. red. perevoda N. A. Shmatko. M.: Institut eksperimental’noy sotsiologii; SPb.: Aletey’ya, 2007. 288 s. (Seriya «Gallicinium»).
2. Veber M. Khozyaystvo i obshchestvo / per. s nem. pod nauch. red. L. G. Ionina. M.: Izd-vo GU-VShE, 2010.
3. Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Astrakhanskoy oblasti (GAAO). F. 1. Op. 4. T. 2. D. 1635. O naznachenii chinovnikov v pochetnye smotriteli uezdnykh uchilishch. 1816 g. 10 l.
4. GAAO. F. 1. Op. 4. T. 2. D. 1871. O publichnykh ispytaniyakh uchenikov uezdnykh uchilishch. LL.1-3. 1816 god. 87 l.
5. Gaydenko P. P., Davydov Yu. P. Problema byurokratii u Maksa Vebera // Voprosy filosofii. 1991. № 3. S. 174–182.
6. Maslovskiy M. V. Teoriya byurokratii Maksa Vebera i sovremennaya politicheskaya sotsiologiya: monografiya. N.-Novgorod: Izd-vo Nizhegor. gos. un-ta, 1997. 87 s.
7. Mizes L. fon. Byurokratiya / per. s angl. E. Zhuravskoy; pod red. B. Pinskera. Chelyabinsk: Sotsium. 2006. 200 s.
8. Orlova G. A. Byurokraticheskoe pis’mo kak mekhanizm gospodstva // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. 1999. № 5. S. 76–82.
9. Pisar’kova L. Rossiyskiy chinovnik na sluzhbe i doma // Chelovek. 1995. № 3–4.
10. Pyastolov S. M., Sudarev O. I. Mifologemy «russkoy modeli upravleniya» v svete institutsional’noy skhemy razvitiya // Ekonomicheskiy vestnik Rostovskogo gos. u-ta. 2008. T. 6. № 1. S. 71–77.
11. RGIA (Rossiyskiy Gosudarstvennyi Istoricheskiy arkhiv). F.1341. Departament Senata. Op. 10. D. 553. Ob uchrezhdenii mundira chinovnika Kazanskogo Uchebnogo Okruga. 15.11. 1809. 45 l.
12. RGIA. F.1405 Op. 60. D. 5091. Po otnosheniyu MNP o predostavlenii popechitelyam uchebnykh okrugov, v tselyakh sokrashcheniya deloproizvodstva prava opredeleniya na sluzhbu po uchebnoy chasti lits podatnogo sostoyaniya i isklyuchitel’no iz podushnogo oklada, ne zaprashivaya razresheniya Senata 12 l. 31.08.1862 – 10.11.1862. 20 l.
13. RGIA. F. 1158. Op. 1 D. 22. O prodlenii deystviya zakona 17.06.1910 «O vremennom usilenii shtata tsentral’nogo upravleniya MNP». 1913.
14. RGIA. F. 740. Op. 38. D. 242. Ob uluchshenii byta sluzhashchikh v pravitel’stvennykh uchrezhdeniyakh. 1916.
15. Savitskaya I. S. Kontseptsii formirovaniya rossiyskoy sistemy obrazovaniya v pervoy treti XIX v. // Materialy XIV Vserossiyskoy nauch.-praktich. konferentsii studentov, aspirantov i molodykh uchenykh. 13 aprelya 2012 g. M., 2012. S. 65–68.
16. Tokvil’ A. Staryi poryadok i revolyutsiya / per. s fr. L. N. Yefimova. SPb.: Aletey’ya, 2008. 248 s.
