B. Yu. Norman
Price: 50 руб.
Word form as a vehicle (representative) of the grammatical meaning is a part of the word-changing paradigm. However, typical (basic) syntactic function of the word form establishes the basis for its “separation”. Such process which is understood in linguistics as a lexicalization, is illustrated in the article with examples of the Russian word forms, phrasal expressions such as “as a warning”, “in no uncertain terms”, “with deep regret”, “to the touch”. Internal confl ict between the whole paradigm and an individual word form is revealed. The article is based on dictionary data and the National Corpus of the Russian Language. As a result, the wholeness of a paradigm is defi ned as a virtual and relative characteristic. On the other hand, the incomplete paradigm serves as a means (tool) of explication of formal consolidation of its lexical meaning.
Keywords: word form, grammatical meaning, paradigm, lexicalization.
REFERENCES
1. Bondarko A. V. Teoreticheskie problemy russkoy grammatiki. SPb., 2004.
2. Bol’shoy tolkovyi slovar’ russkogo yazyka / glav. red. S. A. Kuznetsov. SPb., 1998.
3. Vezhbitskaya A. Deskriptsiya ili tsitatsiya // Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike. Vyp. XIII.
Logika i lingvistika. M., 1982. S. 237–262.
4. Vinogradov V. V. Russkiy yazyk (Grammaticheskoe uchenie o slove). M.; L., 1947.
5. Vinogradov V. V. Osnovnye tipy leksicheskogo znacheniya slova // Vinogradov V. V.
Izbrannye trudy. Leksikologiya i leksikografi ya. M., 1977. S. 162–189.
6. Zolotova G. A. Kommunikativnye aspekty sintaksisa. M., 1982.
7. Zolotova G. A. K oppozitsii izosemichnost’/neizosemichnost’ v russkom sintaksise //
Linguistique et slavistique. Melanges offerts a Paul Garde. Tome I. Paris, 1992. S. 533–539.
8. Karaulov Yu. N. Assotsiativnaya grammatika russkogo yazyka. M., 1993.
9. Langakker R. V. Model’, osnovannaya na yazykovom upotreblenii // Vestnik Mosk. un-ta. Seriya 9. Filologiya. 1997. № 4. S. 160–174.
10. Norman B. Ekspressivno-otsenochnaya leksika v nepredikatnoy pozitsii // Juzhnoslovenski fi lolog. LXIII. Beograd, 2007. S. 67–81.
11. Norman B. Polnota/nepolnota paradigmy kak priznak slova // Gramatika i leksika u
slovenskim jezitsima. Zbornik radova s meħunarodnog simpozijuma. Novi Sad – Beograd, 2011. S. 151–164.
12. Rakhilina E. V. Kognitivnyi analiz predmetnykh imen: semantika i sochetaemost’. M., 2000.
13. Slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo yazyka. 2-e izd. M., 1991–1993.
T. I–VI.
14. Slovar’ yazyka Pushkina. M., 1956–1961.
15. Gries S. Th., Divjak D. Behavioral profi les: A corpus-based approach to cognitive
semantic analysis // New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics / ed. by V. Evans and S. Pourcel. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2009. P. 57–75.
16. Janda L. A., Lyashevskaya О. Grammatical profi les and the interaction of the lexicon with aspect, tense, and mood in Russian // Cognitive Linguistics, 22. (2011) N 4. P. 719–763.
