V. M. Nesterenko, N. M. Melnik
Price: 0 руб.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25807/22224378_2021_12_10
The article examines the didactic barriers and paradoxes of traditional higher education.
The authors give reasons for the value of higher education, which is realised in the ability of a highly quali쨽ed university graduate to create new personal knowledge in the process of designing a relevant product in cooperation with intelligent systems, taking into account trends in the development of the environment throughout working life. The authors prove the possibility and need for universities’ transition to a new educational model, whose basis is the parametric continuum of activity providing commensurate compression of information about the multidimensional real environment of activity in directions of activity representation into a universal model and its divergent contextual deployment when creating personal knowledge on the design of a relevant in-demand product.
Keywords: value of higher education, didactic barrier, parametric continuum of
activity, directions of activity representation, creation of personal knowledge, design of
a relevant product.
References
1. Anisimova N. Yu. Organizatsiya podgotovki kadrov v tsifrovoy ekonomike // Kreativnaya ekonomika. 2021. T. 15. № 3. S. 735–748. doi: 10.18334/ce.15.3.111846.
2. Antonova O. G., Dyl’nova Z. M. K voprosu o tendentsiyakh razvitiya rossiyskogo vysshego obrazovaniya // Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Povolzhskiy region. Obshchestvennye nauki. 2017. № 4 (44). S. 127–135. DOI: 10.21685/2072-3016-2017-4-14.
3. Gopka A. Retsept ekonomicheskogo chuda: kakie universitety zalozhat osnovy dlya tekhnologicheskogo ryvka // Forbs 18 marta 2020. URL: https://www.forbes.ru/biznes/395161-recept-ekonomicheskogo-chuda-
kakie-universitety-zalozhat-osnovy-dlya-tehnologicheskogo (data obrashcheniya: 05.09.2021).
4. Digilina O. B., Teslenko I. B. Transformatsiya rynka truda v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii // Vestnik RGGU. Seriya «Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo». 2019. № 4. S. 166–181.
5. Ye밓mov V. S., Lapteva A. V. Universitet 4.0: 22. Bessen J. How Computer Automation Affects Occupations: Technology, Jobs, and Skills. Boston: Boston University School of Law. Law and Economics Paper, 2016. No. 15-49. URL: https://ssrn.com/ab-
stract=2690435 (data obrashcheniya: 15.10.2021).
23. Brynjolfsson E., Mitchell T., Rock D. What Can Machines Learn and What Does It Mean for Occupations and the Economy? // American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings. 2018. Vol. 108. P. 43–47. DOI: 10.1257/pandp.20181019.
24. Gimpelson V. The Labor Market in Russia, 2000–2017 // IZA World of Labor, Germany. 2019. No. 466. P. 1–13. URL: https://wol.iza.org/articles/the-labor-market-in-russia/long (data obrashcheniya: 15.10.2021).
25. Graetz G., Michaels G. Robots and Work. Bonn: IZA. IZA Discussion Paper 8938 Mach 2015. URL: https://ftp.iza.org/dp8938.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 15.10.2021).
26. Namir A. Paving the Way for the Future of Work // Canadian Public Policy. 2018. No.44. P. 167-176.
27. The Future of Jobs Report 2020 // World Economic Forum, 2020. 162 p. URL: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2020.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 19.10.2021).
