The article discusses the psychological readiness of parents in the framework of social
partnership with a preschool educational institution. The main components of the structure of psychological readiness for this interaction are described. The author substantiates the idea that the success of interaction between subjects of pedagogical activity requires not only professionalism and communicative competence of kindergarten teachers, but also motivation of pupils’ parents to increase their knowledge of child development.
Key words: psychological readiness, parents, social partnership, preschool educational
institution, subjects of pedagogical activity.
article/n/problema-psihologicheskoy-gotovnosti-roditeley-razlichnyh-kategoriy-detey-k-inklyuzivnomu-
obrazovaniyu (data obrashcheniya: 23.04.2020).
3. Alekseyeva E. E., Koval’ O. A. O formirovanii sotsial’no-psikhologicheskoy gotovnosti roditeley k obu-
cheniyu rebenka v shkole // Gertsenovskie chteniya. Nachal’noe obrazovanie. 2011. T. 2. № 1. S. 128–135.
4. Danilina T. A., Stenina N. M. Sotsial’noe partnerstvo pedagogov, detey i roditeley. Posobie dlya prak-
ticheskikh rabotnikov DOU. M.: Ayris-press, 2004.112 s. (Doshkol’noe vospitanie i razvitie).
5. Derkach A. A., Isaev A. A. Pedagogicheskoe masterstvo trenera. M.: Fizkul’tura i sport, 1981. 375 s.
6. Doronova T. N. Vzaimodeystvie doshkol’nogo uchrezhdeniya s roditelyami: posobie dlya rabotnikov
doshkol’nykh obrazovatel’nykh uchrezhdeniy». M., 2002. 120 s.
7. Dorokhina N. A. Vzaimodeystvie starshego pokoleniya sem’i s det’mi doshkol’nogo vozrasta: avtoref-
erat dis. kandidata pedagogicheskikh nauk. Moskva, 2009. 16 s.
8. Zhukova V. F. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskiy analiz kategorii «psikhologicheskaya gotovnost’» //
Izvestiya Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. 2012. № 6. S. 117–121.
9. Zvereva O. L. Obshchenie pedagoga s roditelyami v DOU: Metodicheskiy aspekt. M.: TTs Sfera. 2007.
78 s.
10. Kozlova A. V., Desheulina R. P. Rabota DOU s sem’yoy: metodicheskie rekomendatsii. M.: TTs Sfera,
2007. 112 s.
11. Klimov E. A. Psikhologiya deyatel’nosti / Prof. tekh. obrazovanie. 1973. № 1. S. 56–57.
12. Kucheryavenko I. A. Problema psikhologicheskoy gotovnosti k professional’noy deyatel’nosti // Molo-
doy uchenyi. 2011. № 12. T. 2. S. 60–62.
13. Levitov N. D. O psikhicheskikh sostoyaniyakh cheloveka. M.: Prosveshchenie, 1964. 79 s.
14. Ostrovskaya L. F. Pedagogicheskie znaniya — roditelyam: (Materialy seminarov dlya roditeley).
Posobie dlya vospitateley doshk. uchrezhdeniya. M.: Prosveshchenie, 1983. 176 s.
15. Remorenko I. M. Raznoe upravlenie dlya raznogo obrazovaniya. SPb.: Agentstvo obrazovatel’nogo
sotrudnichestva, 2005. 368 s.
16. Sosnina N. V., Starobina E. M. Vzaimodeystvie doshkol’nogo obrazovatel’nogo uchrezhdeniya s
sem’yoy // ChiO. 2010. № 4. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vzaimodeystvie-doshkolnogo-obrazo-
vatelnogo-uchrezhdeniya-s-semiey (data obrashcheniya: 23.04.2020).
17. Shvetsova N. I. Metodika vzaimodeystviya s sem’yoy // Molodoy uchenyi. 2015. № 5 (85). S. 554–
556. URL: https://moluch.ru/archive/85/16027/ (data obrashcheniya: 23.04.2020).
18. Henderson A. T. and Berla N. (1994). A new generation of evidence: The family is critical to student
achievement. Washington, DC: National Committee for Citizens in Education. Р. 160.