T. N. Ishchenko, T. A. Stepanenko, A.V. Bardakov
Price: 50 руб.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25807/PBH.22224378.2020.3.8.15
The problems of developing the activity-related and mental abilities of a person, a subject of cognition and a holistic personality have led to recourse to dialectics as a method of scientific cognition, to a method of dialectical learning as a progressive technology based on the principle of contradiction and the developed ability to construct problematic issues. The comprehension of the content of a subject, a scientific text through the development of key problematic issues, requiring the establishment of relationships between concepts, and the search for answers that reveal key contradictions, provides, in our opinion, unique means for developing the cognitive ability of the cogniser. Turning to classical philosophy and the method of dialectical teaching makes it possible to start the process of discovering new knowledge, comprehension together with students, on the basis of the principles of contradiction, unity of the historical and the logical, activity mediation, and cooperation. Mastering of concepts (knowledge) through problematic issues is considered as a process of understanding, in whose conditions a person’s potential in the development of thinking and creative abilities is revealed.
Key words: thinking, content of a subject, problematic issue, dialectics, method of dialectical learning, educational process, cognition.
References
1. Blonskiy P. P. Pamyat’ i myshlenie. SPb.: Piter, 2001. 288 s.
2. Vygotskiy L. S. Myshlenie i rech’. SPb.: Piter, 2017. 432 s.
3. Goncharuk A. I. Kontseptsiya shkoly XXI veka (dialektika uchebnogo protsessa): monografiya. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyar. gos. un-t, 2002. 68 s.
4. Il’yenkov E. V. Dialekticheskaya logika: ocherki istorii i teorii. 2-e izd., dop. M.: Politizdat, 1984. 320 s.
5. Il’yenkov E. V. Shkola dolzhna uchit’ myslit’. URL: https://tovievich.ru/book/korni/9432-jevilenkovshkola-dolzhna-uchit-myslit.html (data obrashcheniya: 20.01.2020).
6. Ishchenko T. N. Klassicheskaya filosofiya kak resurs razvitiya sub’yekta poznaniya // Nauchnoe mnenie. SPb., 2019. № 10. S. 31–38.
7. Ishchenko T. N. Problemnyi vopros kak intellektual’noe sredstvo poznaniya // Sibirskiy pedagogicheskiy zhurnal. 2010. № 1. S. 92–101.
8. Leont’yev A. N. Deyatel’nost’ i lichnost’ // Psikhologiya lichnosti. T. 2. Khrestomatiya. Samara: Izdatel’skiy dom «BAKHRAKH-M», 2000. S. 165–196.
9. Lobastov G. V. Dialektika razumnoy formy i fenomenologiya bezumiya. M.: Russkaya panorama, 2012. 560 s.
10. Lobastov G. V. Filosofiya kak deyatel’naya forma soznaniya. M.: Izd-vo Russkaya panorama, 2018. 262 s.
11. Murashov A. A. Kul’tura rechi: ucheb. posobie. M.: Moskovskiy psikhol.-sotsial’nyi in-t; Voronezh: NPO MODEK, 2003. 576 s.
12. Platon. Sobranie sochineniy: v 4 t. / obshch. red. A. F. Loseva, V. F. Asmusa, A. A. Takho-Godi; primech. A. F. Loseva, V. F. Asmusa, A. A. Takho-Godi; per. s drevnegrech. M.: Mysl’, 1993. T. 2. 528 s. (Filosof. Nasledie).
13. Stepanenko T. A., Ishchenko T. N. Dialog kak sredstvo razvitiya sub’yektov obrazovatel’nogo protsessa vysshey shkoly // Nauchnoe mnenie. SPb., 2018. № 10. S. 46–52.
14. Timofeyev A. V. «Tsifrovoy chelovek» kak sub’yekt virtual’noy kommunikatsii // Nauchnoe mnenie. SPb., 2019. № 10. S. 39–41.
