I. E. Yegorychev
Price: 50 руб.
Th author of the paper continues the criticism of private languages that was started
in the works by “late” Wittgenstein, where he showed that although the limits of my
language do mean the limits of my world, the world itself is mine only to the extent of
some language game with more than one player. Th author of the paper proceeds with a
scrupulous analysis of those communicative strategies which can help to overcome both
referential opacity of language and its apparent privateness.
Key words: heterophenomenology, solipsism, language games, consciousness, referential opacity, text.
References
1. Vitgenshteyn L. Filosofskie raboty. Chast’ I. M.: «Gnozis», 1994. 612 s.
2. Delez Zh. Razlichie i povtorenie. SPb.: TOO TK «Petropolis», 1998. 384 s.
3. Dennett D. Vidy psikhiki: na puti k ponimaniyu soznaniya. M.: Ideya-Press, 2004. 184 s.
4. Derrida Zh. Pis’mo i razlichie. SPb.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2000. 432 s.
5. Dawkins M. S. Minding and mattering // Blakemore C., Greenfild S. Mindwaves. Oxford, Blackwell, 1987. pp. 150–160.
