LoginRegistration
For instance: Humanities and Science University Journal
About consortium subscription Contacts
(812) 4095364 Non-commercial partnership
St. Petersburg
university
consortium

Articles

The Scientific Opinion №7-8 (Psycho-pedagogical and philosophy of science), 2022

INTERCONNECTION BETWEEN FLUENCY AND EXPRESSIVENESS OF A WRITTEN UTTERANCE AS AN ISSUE OF LANGUAGE TEACHING METHODOLOGY

Yulia Yu. Gridneva
Price: 0 руб.
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25807/22224378_2022_7–8_142
Abstract. The article examines the phenomenon of writing fluency, as well as its interconnection with expressiveness of a written utterance in a foreign language. The author revises the term “fluency” and analyses characteristics of fluent writing. Fluency of a written utterance is compared to its efficiency and expressiveness.
Keywords: writing, fluency, quantitative characteristics of speech fluency, qualitative characteristics of speech fluency, efficiency, expressiveness
Список источников
1. Nation P. Improving Speaking Fluency // System. 1989. Vol. 17. No 3. P. 377–384.
2. Lennon P. Investigating Fluency in EFL: A Quantitative Approach // Language Learning. 1990. Vol. 40. Issue 3. P. 387–417.
3. Raddaoui A. H. Fluency: A Quantitative and Qualitative account // The Reading Matrix.
2004. Vol. 4 (1). URL: http://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/raddoui/article.pdf (дата обращения: 22.04.2022).
4. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment — Companion volume. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2020. 278 p.
5. Richards J. C. Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Fourth edition. Pearson Education Limited, 2010. 643 p.
6. Поляков О. Г. Аспекты профильно-ориентированного обучения английскому языку в высшей школе. Тамбов: Изд-во ТГУ им. Г. Р. Державина, 2004. 192 с.
7. Abdel Latif M. M. M. What Do We Mean by Writing Fluency and How Can It Be Validly
Measured? // Applied Linguistics. 2013. No 34/1. P. 99–105.
8. Al-saadi Z. Gender differences in writing: The mediating effect of language proficiency and writing fluency in text quality // Cogent Education. 2020. Issue 7. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343741797_Gender_differences_in_writing_The_mediating_effect_of_language_
proficiency_and_writing_fluency_in_text_quality (дата обращения: 23.04.2022).
9. Chandler J. The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing // Journal of Second Language Writing. 2003. Issue 12. P. 267–296.
10. Chenoweth N. A., Hayes J. R. Fluency in Writing. Generating Text in L1 and L2 // Written Communication. 2001. Vol. 18. No 1. P. 80–98.
11. Jebbour M. Self-Disclosure and Moroccan EFL Learners’ Writing Development: Effects on Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency // Journal of Language and Education. 2021. Vol. 7. No 1 (25). P. 127–140.
12. Johnson M. D. Cognitive task complexity and L2 written syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency: A research synthesis and meta-analysis // Journal of Second Language Writing. 2017. Vol. 37. P. 13–38.
13. Ong J., Jun Zhang L. Effects of task complexity on the fluency and lexical complexity in EFL students’ argumentative writing // Journal of Second Language Writing. 2010. No 19. P. 218–233.
14. Pham Vu. Ph. Ho., Thanh Tran T. T., Nguyen N. H. Vy. The Effects of Extensive Journal Writing on the Vietnamese High-School Students’ Writing Accuracy and Fluency // Journal of Language and Education. 2022. Vol. 8. No 1 (29). P. 116–129.
15. Abdi Tabari M. The effects of planning time on complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexical variety in L2 descriptive writing // Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education. 2016. No 1 (10). URL: https://sfleducation.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40862-016-0015-6
(дата обращения: 02.05.2022).
16. John D. ‘Free writing’ versus ‘Writing fluency’ // Journal of Asia TEFL. 2019. No 16 (1). P. 369–376.
17. Johnson M. D., Mercado L., Acevedo A. The effect of planning sub-processes on L2 writing fluency, grammatical complexity, and lexical complexity // Journal of Second Language Writing. 2012. No 21. P. 264–282.
18. Pham Vu. Ph. Ho. The Effects of Collaborative Writing on Students’ Writing Fluency: An Efficient Framework for Collaborative Writing // SAGE Open. 2021. No 1 (11). URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2158244021998363 (дата обращения: 04.05.2022).
19. Fellner T., Apple M. Developing writing fluency and lexical complexity with blogs // TheJALT CALL Journal. 2006. Vol. 2, No. 1. P. 15–26.
20. The Writing of Southeast Asian-American Students in Secondary School and University / E. Tarone et al. // Journal of Second Language Writing. 1993. Vol. 2, No 2. P. 149–172.
21. Reynolds D. W. Linguistic Correlates of Second Language Literacy Development: Evidence from Middle-Grade Learner Essays // Journal of Second Language Writing. 2005. Vol. 14, No 1. P. 19–45.
22. Wolf-Quintero K., Inagaki Sh., Hae-Young K. Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, & complexity. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, 1998. 187 p.
23. Колкер Я. М., Устинова Е. С. Как сделать высказывание точным и выразительным: теория и практика обучения говорению на иностранном языке. М.: Научная книга, 2009. 352 с.
24. Шилина М. В. Лингвистические средства создания экспрессивности в английском художественном тексте: На основе исследования стилистически маркированной/немаркированной лексики: дис. ... канд. филол. наук. М., 2000. 181 с.
25. Арнольд И. В. Стилистика. Современный английский язык: учебник для вузов.
10-е изд., испр. и доп. М.: Флинта; Наука, 2010. 384 с.
26. Гальперин И. Р. Стилистика английского языка. М.: Либроком, 2010. 336 с.
27. Fillmore C. J. On fluency // Individual differences in language ability and language behavior / Eds. C. J. Fillmore, D. Kempler, & W. S. Y. Wang. New York: Academic Press, 1979. P. 85–102.
28. Поляков О. Г. Тормышова Т. Ю. Беглость говорения на иностранном языке как лингвометодическая проблема // Язык и культура. Томск: Национальный исследовательский Томский государственный университет. 2014. No 4 (28). С. 166–174.
29. Guillot M.-N. Fluency and its Teaching. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 1999. 192 p.
30. Туранский И. И. Семантическая категория интенсивности в английском языке. М.: Высшая школа, 1990. 172 с.
31. Вахитова Г. В. Внутренняя экспрессивность текста // Вестник ВЭГУ. Уфа: Восточная экономико-юридическая гуманитарная академия. 2014. No 4 (72). С. 69–76.
32. Баранова Ю. Ю. Сопоставление нетропеических способов выражения экспрессивности в художественном тексте на русском и английском языках // Иностранные языки в выс-шей школе: Научный журнал. Рязань: Издательство РГУ им. С. А. Есенина, 2009. Вып. 1 (8). С. 90–98.
33. Гриднева Ю. Ю. Обучение студентов младших курсов языкового вуза риторическим характеристикам экспрессивного письменного высказывания // Иностранные языки в высшей школе. Рязань: РГУ им. С. А. Есенина, 2016. No 4 (39). С. 70–75.
Price: 0 рублей
To order