The purpose of the paper is to conduct a comparative analysis of the application of modern information technologies in the theoretical and practical areas of artistic shaping of architectural objects in Russia and in the West. The paper analyzes the infl uence of universal (Internet) and highly specialized (professional software) IT on the artistic features of shaping in architecture. It is concluded that today, the level of IT application in project activities in Russia and in the West virtually does not differ: the same software of the same developers is used to draw and calculate the artistic features of building forms and structures. However, the author has revealed that today Russia lags signifi cantly behind the West in the use of advanced IT achievements in scientifi c and theoretical 

study of artistic shaping.

Keywords: IT in architecture, artistic shaping, neuroar-chitecture.

1. Agapitova O. V., Zakharova G. B. Problemy adaptatsii universal’nogo program-

mnogo obespecheniya k resheniyu zadach predpriyatiya // Novye informatsionnye 

tekhnologii v arkhitekture i stroitel’stve: materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii 

s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem. Yekaterinburg: Ural’skiy gosudarstvennyi arkhitekturno-

khudozhestvennyi un-t, 2020. S. 5.

2. Aytreking v psikhologicheskoy nauke i praktike / Otv. red. V. A. Barabanshchikov. 

M.: Kogito-Tsentr, 2015. 410 s.

3. Burdina N. A. Aspekty psikhicheskogo vozdeystviya geometrii formy prostranstva 

inter’yera na zhiznedeyatel’nost’ cheloveka: Dis. ... kand. arkhitektury. Yekaterinburg: 

UrGAKHA, 2004. 163 l.

4. Vityuk E. Yu. Vliyanie informatsionnykh tekhnologiy na arkhitekturnoe formoo-

brazovanie // Novye informatsionnye tekhnologii v arkhitekture i stroitel’stve: materialy 

nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem. Yekaterinburg: 

Ural’skiy gosudarstvennyi arkhitekturno-khudozhestvennyi un-t, 2020. S. 9.

5. Istomina S. A. Vliyanie arkhitekturno-kompozitsionnykh postroeniy na 

cheloveka // Vestnik Tomskogo gos. un-ta. Kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. 2018. 

№ 30. S. 56–67.

6. Pomorov S. B. Terminologiya nelineynoy arkhitektury i aspekty eyo primeneniya // 

Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel’nogo universiteta. 2014. 

№ 3(44). S. 78–87.

7. Bermudez J., Krizaj D., Lipschitz D. Externally-induced meditative states: an 

exploratory fMRI study of architects’ responses to contemplative architecture // Frontiers 

of Architectural Research. 2017. №6. P. 123-136. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/

science/article/pii/S2095263517300055?via%3Dihub (data obrashcheniya 20.08.2021).

8. Eberhard J. P. Applying Neuroscience to Architecture // Neuron. 2009. 

V. 62. Issue 6. P. 753-756. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/

S0896627309004310# (data obrashcheniya 19.08.2021).

9. Hewitt M. A. Is Ornament Necessary? Answers from Brain Science // ANFA 

2018 Conference Shared behavioral outcomes. 2018. P. 76. URL: http://anfarch.org/

wp-content/uploads/2018/10/2018-Abstract_10.06-SINGLE.pdf (data obrashcheniya 

20.08.2021).

10. Sussman A., Hollander J. B. Using biometric software to understand the archi-

tectural experience and improve design // ANFA 2018 Conference Shared behavioral 

outcomes. 2018. P.184. URL: http://anfarch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/2018-

Abstract_10.06-SINGLE.pdf (data obrashcheniya 19.08.2021).

11. Sussman A., Ward J. M. How Biometric Software is Changing How We Under-

stand Architecture and Ourselves // URL: https://commonedge.org/how-biometric-soft-

ware-is-changing-how-we-understand-architecture-and-ourselves/ (data obrashcheniya 

19.08.2021).

Price: 0 рублей