LoginRegistration
For instance: The Scientific Opinion
About consortium subscription Contacts
(812) 4095364 Non-commercial partnership
St. Petersburg
university
consortium

Articles

The Scientific Opinion №6 (Psycho-pedagogical and philosophy of science), 2021

THE DEVELOPMENT OF A FUND OF ASSESSMENT MATERIALS FOR A DISCIPLINE

E. Yu. Yelizarova
Price: 0 руб.
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25807/22224378_2021_6_52
The article deals with the problem of updating the content and form of the fund of
assessment materials for certification of students in the “Teacher Education” field of
training. The existing approaches to the formation of funds are analysed, and a new
format of the structure of the assessment fund is determined. The passport of the
assessment fund includes a list of planned results of training in the discipline, correlated
with the planned results of mastering the main professional educational programme,
and a final table showing the level of formation of the competencies in the discipline.
The practical value of the obtained results is that the approaches that form the basis for
creating a fund of assessment materials for the discipline can be used in the development of materials in different areas of undergraduate training.
Keywords: fund of assessment materials, fund passport, list of learning outcomes,
achievement indicators.
References
1. Babenko V. M. Kompetentnostno-orientirovannyi podkhod k razrabotke fonda otsenochnykh sredstv distsipliny // Universum: tekhnicheskie nauki. 2016. No 2 (24). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kompetentnostno-orientirovannyy-podhod-k-razrabotke-fonda-otsenochnyh-sredstv-distsipliny (data obrashcheniya: 14.03.2021).
2. Bugakova N. Yu. Fondy otsenochnykh sre dstv pri razrabotke osnovnykh obrazovatel’nykh programm bakalavriata: materialy mezhd. nauchno-pr. konf. // Mode rniza tsiya professional’no-pedagogicheskogo obrazova niya: tendentsii, strategiya, zarubezhnyi opyt. Barna ul: Altayskaya gos. ped. akad. 2014. S. 162–164.
3. Vdovina S. A., Kungurova I. M. Proektirovanie fonda otsenochnykh sredstv v usloviyakh realizatsii novykh obrazovatel’nykh standartov // ChiO. 2013. No 2 (35). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/proektirovanie-fonda-otsenochnyh-sredstv-v-usloviyah-realizatsii-novyh-obrazovatelnyh-standartov (data obrashcheniya: 14.04.2021).
4. Vorontsova O. R., Katerzhina S. F. Shagi proektirovaniya kontrol’no-izmeritel’nykh materialov v ramkakh formirovaniya kompetentsiy // Vestnik KGU. 2011. No 3. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/shagi-proektirovaniya-kontrolno-izmeritelnyh-materialov-v-ramkah-formirovaniya-kompetentsiy (data obrashcheniya: 04.04.2021).
5. Galkina E. A. Konstruirovanie sistemy otsenki kachestva biologicheskogo obrazovaniya // Kontsept: nauchno-metodicheskiy elektronnyi zhurnal ofitsial’nogo sayta evristicheskikh olimpiad «Sovenok» i «Proryv». Fevral’ 2012. Kirov, 2012. URL: http://www.covenok.ru/koncept/2012/1212.htm (data obrashcheniya 23.04.2021).
6. Gromova L. A., Bavina P. A., Kondrashin A. V. Upravlenie proektirovaniem obrazovatel’nykh programm v ramkakh trebovaniy federal’nykh gosudarstvennykh obrazovatel’nykh standartov vysshego professional’nogo obrazovaniya tret’yego pokoleniya: metodicheskoe posobie. SPb.: Izd-vo RGPU im. A. I. Gertsena, 2010. 104 s.
7. Yelizarova E. Yu. Metodika formirovaniya professional’nykh kompetentsiy studentov pri obuchenii algebry // Aktual’nye problemy matematiki i informatiki: teoriya, metodika, praktika: sb. mater. V mezhd. nauchno-prak. konf. [pod red. S. V. Shcherbatykh]. Izd-vo: Eletskiy gos. un-t im. I.A. Bunina (Elets), 2019. S. 102–107.
8. Yefremova N. F. Podkhody k otsenivaniyu kompetentsiy v vysshem obrazovanii. M.: Issled. tsentr, 2010. 216 s.
9. Zabodalova L. A., Nadtochiy L. A., Orlova O. Yu. Kompetentnostno-orientirovannye zadaniya v sisteme vysshego obrazovaniya. SPb.: NIU ITMO, 2014. 98 s.
10. Kachurina T. A. Osobennosti formirovaniya fonda otsenochnykh sredstv v ramkakh realizatsii standartov novogo pokoleniya // Innovatsionnoy obespechenie obrazovatel’nykh standartov. 2012. No 1. S. 259–264.
11. Kulikova E. V. Opyt sostavleniya fondov otsenochnykh sredstv po distsipline «Istoriya matematiki» // ANI: pedagogika i psikhologiya. 2015. No 4 (13). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/opyt-sostavleniya-fondov-otsenochnyh-sredstv-po-distsipline-istoriya-matematiki (data obrashcheniya: 09.02.2021).
12. Minin M. G., Muratova E. A., Mikhaylova N. S. Fond otsenochnykh sredstv v strukture obrazovatel’nykh programm // Vyssheye obrazovanie v Rossii. 2011. No 5. S. 112–118.
13. Perevoshchikova E. N. Kontseptual’nye osnovy konstruirovaniya sredstv dlya otsenivaniya obrazovatel’nykh rezul’tatov // Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta. 2016. No 2 (15). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kontseptualnye-osnovy-konstruirovaniya-sredstv-dlya-otsenivaniya-obrazovatelnyh-rezultatov (data obrashcheniya: 25.01.2021).
14. Perevoshchikova E. N. Modernizatsiya obrazovatel’nogo protsessa: sozdanie fonda otsenochnykh sredstv po distsipline «Sovremennye sredstva otsenivaniya rezul’tatov obucheniya». Nizhniy Novgorod: Mininskiy universitet, 2018, 267 s.
15. Perevoshchikova E. N. Razrabotka fondovykh zadaniy dlya otsenki kompetentsiy vypusknikov bakalavriata pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya na gosudarstvennom ekzamene // Aktual’nye problemy obucheniya matematike i informatike v shkole i vuze: mater. V mezhdunar. zaoch. nauch. konf., 18–22 dekabrya 2019
g. [pod red. M. V. Egupovoy, L. I. Bozhenkovoy]. Moskva: MPGU, 2020. S. 43–49.
16. Polozhenie o formirovanii fonda otsenochnykh sredstv dlya provedeniya tekushchego kontrolya uspevaemosti i promezhutochnoy attestatsii. NGPU im. K. Minina. URL: https://mininuniver.ru/training/lokalnye-akty-po-obrazovatelnomu-protsessu (data obra shche niya: 19.03. 2021).
17. Profstandart Pedagoga 2020, utverzhdennyi Pravitel’stvom RF. URL: https://rusjurist.ru/kadry/professionalnye_standarty/profstandart-pedagoga-utverzhdennyj-pravitelstvom-rf/ (data obra shche niya: 19.03.2021 g.).
18. Pryadekho A. A., Pryadekho A. N. Sistema metodicheskogo obespecheniya uchebnogo protsessani-versiteta v svete polozheniy Bolonskogo protsessa // Vestnik BGU. 2009. No 1. URL: https://cyberleninka.
ru/article/n/sistema-metodicheskogo-obespecheniya-uchebnogo-protsessa-universiteta-v-svete-polozheniy-bolonskogo-protsessa (data obrashcheniya: 10.04.2021).
19. Federal’nyi gosudarstvennyi obrazovatel’nyi standart vysshego obrazovaniya — bakalavriat po napravleniyu podgotovki 44.03.05 Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie (s dvumya profilyami podgotovki), utverzhdennyi prikazom Minobrnauki Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 22.02.2018. No 125. URL: http://fgosvo.ru/440305 (data obrashcheniya: 19.03. 2021).
20. Bruijn T. Assessment and Demonstration of Achieved Learning Outcomes: Recommendations and Good Practices. Outcomes of the NVAO Peer Learning Event on 29–30 October 2015. February 2016. 32 p.
21. Dicker R., Garcia M., Kelly A., Mulrooney H. What does ‘quality’ in higher education mean? Perceptions of staff, students and employers // Studies in Higher Education. 2019. No 44 (8), pp. 1425–1441.
22. Emery N., Maher J.M., Ebert-May D. Studying Professional Development as Part of the Complex Ecosystem of STEM Higher Education// Innovative Higher Education, 2019.44(6), pp. 469–479.
23. Espinoza O., Gonzales L., Sandoval L., Castillo D. Assessment of academic training and job placement in graduates from teaching in basic education programs in Chile. — Online Submission, EDUR • Educação em Revista. 2018; 34:e188596. URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (date of treatment: 29.03. 2021).
24. Hill H.C., Chin M. Connections Between Teachers’ Knowledge of Students, Instruction, and Achievement Outcomes // American Educational Research Journal. 2018. No 55 (5), pp. 1076–1112.
25. Klerk R., Klaas V., Welie L. Quality Assessment and Education Policy at the Universiteit van Amsterdam the Netherlands [Internet]. Online Submission, OECD/IMHE, 2008 [cited 2018 Feb 02]. URL: http://www.oecd.org/netherlands/1871470.pdf (date of treatment: 19.02. 2021 г.).
26. Stankeviciene Ju. Assessment of Teaching Quality: Survey of University Graduates. — Online Submission, Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research (University of Ghent, Sep 19-21, 2007). URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234567226_Assessment_of_Teaching_Qual-
ity_Survey_of_University_Graduates (date of treatment: 19.02. 2021 г.).
27. Stepanova M. Comprehensive quality assessment in Higher Education. English Studies at NBU, 2016. Vol. 2. No 2. Pp. 77–88.
28. Vaganova O. I., Smirnova Zh. V., Abramova N. S., Tsarapkina J. M., Bazavlutskaya L. M. Current requirements for assessing the results of student training. Online Submission: IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering. March 2019. pp. 012002 URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331908400_Current_requirements_for_assessing_the_results_of_student_training (date of treatment: 19.02. 2021 г.).
29. Vykydal D., Folta M., Nenadál J. A Study of Quality Assessment in Higher Education within the Context of Sustainable Development: A Case Study from Czech Republic. — Online Submission, Sustainability 2020, No12. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342173860_A_Study_of_Quality_Assessment_
in_Higher_Education_within_the_Context_of_Sustainable_Development_A_Case_Study_from_Czech_Re-
public (date of treatment: 19.02. 2021).
Price: 0 рублей
To order