M. O. Knyazkova
Price: 0 руб.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25807/22224378_2021_6_29
The article presents the theoretical and methodological foundations and results of the
study of the discrepancy between the significance of values for an individual and their
realisability. The author’s modification of the methodology for diagnosing an intraper-
sonal conflict by E. B. Fantalova is intended to assess the presence/absence of a value
conflict, in particular in the ethnocultural sphere. The study was conducted on two signif-
icantly different samples: students and people with disabilities, which allowed the author
to get informative results. In particular, it was found that a conflict is more pronounced
in a group of students. This may be due to the fact that students have a higher level of
reflection and a tendency to introspection than people with disabilities, for whom health
is a more significant, but more difficult to implement value. There is an obvious need
for a more in-depth analysis of the value sphere of both groups studied. The analysis of
personal values will help to assess the possibility of resolving an ethno-cultural conflict.
Keywords: intrapersonal conflict, conflict in the ethnocultural sphere, personality, val-
ues, conflict of values, ethnic identity, ethnos.
References
1. Akimova M. K., Kiseleva A. V. Vnutrenniy tsennostnyi konflikt kak faktor agressivnosti v yunosheskom vozraste // Teoreticheskaya i eksperimental’naya psikhologiya. 2009. T. 2 No 3. S. 49–57. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vnutrenniy-tsennostnyy-konflikt-kak-faktor-agressivnosti-v-yunosheskom-vozraste (data obrashcheniya: 10.03.2021).
2. Knyaz’kova M. O. Osobennosti etnicheskoy identifikatsii i koping-strategiy kak indikatorov vnutrilichnostnogo konflikta / Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo federal’nogo universiteta imeni V. I. Vernadskogo. Sotsiologiya. Pedagogika. Psikhologiya. 2019. Tom 5 (71). No 1. S. 70–75.
3. Knyaz’kova M. O. Etnokul’turnaya spetsifika vnutrilichnostnogo konflikta: postanovka problemy / Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo federal’nogo universiteta imeni V.I. Vernadskogo. Sotsiologiya. Pedagogika. Psikhologiya, 2018.Tom 4 (70). No 4. S. 76–86.
4. Kraeva M. Yu. Krizis «serediny zhizni» i tsennostnye konflikty lichnosti // Aktual’nye problemy gumanitarnykh i yestestvennykh nauk. 2015. No 5. S. 213–221.
5. Krayg G. Psikhologiya razvitiya. SPb., 2000. S. 557–742.
6. Lesin A. M. Opredelenie lichnostnoy znachimosti i soderzhaniya tsennostey // Lichnost’ v menyayushchemsya mire: zdorov’ye, adaptatsiya, razvitie. 2020. No 4. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/opredelenie-lichnostnoy-znachimosti-i-soderzhaniya-tsennostey (data obrashcheniya: 10.03.2021).
7. L’dokova G. M., Dmitrieva K. Yu. Etnopsikhologicheskie osobennosti tsennostnykh i smyslozhiznennykh orientatsiy studentov // Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya. 2019. No 64-3.
URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/etnopsihologicheskie-osobennosti-tsennostnyh-i-smyslozhiznennyh-orientatsiy-studentov (data obrashcheniya: 10.03.2021).
8. Suleymanov R. F., Tsupa A. V. Kross-kul’turnye razlichiya v kul’turno-tsennostnoy orientatsii livanskogo i russkogo etnosov // Obshchestvo: sotsiologiya, psikhologiya, pedagogika. 2020. No 3. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kross-kulturnye-razlichiya-v-kulturno-tsennostnoy-orientatsii-livanskogo-i-russkogo-etnosov (data obrashcheniya: 10.03.2021).
9. Fantalova E. B. Diagnostika i psikhoterapiya vnutrennego konflikta. Samara: Izdatel’skiy dom «BAKHRAKH-M», 2001. 128 s.
