A. G. Egorov
Price: 0 руб.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25807/22224378_2021_6_10
The author of the paper analyses such a seemingly inappropriate and unexpected
property of a concept as its power. A concept is understood not as a formal logical
concept constructed by reason, but as an ideal (and at the same time real) onto-
epistemological formation, which has a substantial, dynamic and contradictory
character. By power the author means a certain invariant of all known and conceivable
powers: mechanical, physical, chemical, biological, mental, social, intellectual and
spiritual. Power is a manifestation of difference, tension, energy between the poles of a biner and other elements that make it up. The analysis was carried out mainly
using the concept of duality developed by the author of the article. This work can be
useful in studying both thinking itself and the functioning of a concept in the process
of thinking.
Keywords: concept, power, binary analysis, biner, energy.
References
1. Agadzhanyan A. S. Buddiyskiy put’ v XX veke: religioznye tsennosti i sovremennaya istoriya stran tkheravady. M., 1993, 295 s.
2. Bkhagavadgita / per. s sanskrita, issled. i primech. V. S. Sementsova. 2 izd., ispr. i dop. M.: Izdatel’skaya firma «Vostochnaya literatura» RAN, 1999. 256 s.
3. Vernadskiy V. I. Khimicheskoe stroenie biosfery Zemli i eyo okruzheniya. M., 1965, 374 s.
4. Gegel’ G. Nauka logiki: v 3 t. M., 1972. T. 3. 371 s.
5. Gegel’ G. Lektsii po istorii filosofii. Kniga vtoraya. SPb., 1994, 423 s.
6. Gryaznova E. V. Virtual’naya real’nost’: analiz smyslovykh elementov ponyatiya // Filosofskie nauki. 2005, 2. S. 125–143.
7. Il’in I. A. Filosofiya Gegelya kak uchenie o konkretnosti Boga i cheloveka. SPb., 1994, 543 s.
8. Kogen G. Teoriya opyta Kanta. Glava 16. Sistema kriticheskogo idealizma // Voprosy filosofii. 2006, 4. S. 151–173.
9. Kurikalov Yu. L. Ot slov k logosu. (Etyud filosofskoy germenevtiki) // Logos. Kniga 1. LGU. 1991. S. 178–198.
10. Losev A. F. Filosofiya imeni // Losev A. F. Bytie. Imya. Kosmos. M., 1993. S. 613–801.
11. Losskiy N. O. Istoriya russkoy filosofii. M., 1991. 480 s.
12. Mirskiy E. M. Nauka kak sotsial’nyi institut // Filosofiya nauki / pod red. S. A. Lebedeva: uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov. M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt; Triksta, 2004. (“Gaedeamus”). S. 301–382.
13. Nikitin N. N. Kurs teoreticheskoy mekhaniki. M.: Vysshaya shkola. 1990. 607 s.
14. Puchkov D. B. Ratsional’nye osnovaniya individual’nogo bytiya cheloveka: avtoref. dis. ... kand. filosof. nauk. SPb., 2010. 22 s.
15. Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Chto takoe filosofiya? // Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Chto takoe filosofiya? M., 1991. S. 51–191.
16. Satprem. Shri Aurobindo, ili Puteshestvie soznaniya. L., 1989. 334 s.
17. Tomberg V. Starshie Arkany Taro. SPb., 2000. 733 s.
18. Trubetskoy S. N. Uchenie o logose v ego istorii // Trubetskoy S. N. Sochineniya. M., 1994. S. 43–480.
19. Florenskiy P. A. U vodorazdelov mysli. M., 1990. 448 s.
20. Khaytun S. D. Chelovechestvo na fone universal’noy evolyutsii: stsenarii energeticheskogo budushchego // Voprosy filosofii. 11. 2005. S. 90–105.
21. Cherepanov I. V. Kvantovo-informatsionnaya spetsifika bytiya soznaniya: dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni doktora filosofskikh nauk. Novosibirsk, 2017. 315 s.
22. Sheler M. Polozhenie cheloveka v Kosmose // Problema cheloveka v zapadnoy filosofii. M., 1988. S. 31–95
23. Engel’s F. Dialektika prirody //Marks K., Engel’s F. Soch., 2-e izd. T. 20. M., 1961. S. 343–628.
24. Epshteyn M. Znak probela: O budushchem gumanitarnykh nauk. M., 2004. 864 s.
