LoginRegistration
For instance: Humanities and Science University Journal
About consortium subscription Contacts
(812) 4095364 Non-commercial partnership
St. Petersburg
university
consortium

Articles

The Scientific Opinion №5 (Psycho-pedagogical and philosophy of science), 2021

THE PROBLEM OF PARENTAL PROCRASTINATION, OR THE ISSUE OF A PARENT AS AN AGENT OF RELATIONS WITH A CHILD

А. V. Zobkov
Price: 0 руб.
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25807/22224378_2021_5_120
Procrastination is considered from the perspective of subjective activity. The question
of the need to study parental procrastination is raised. The paper presents the results
of testing the pilot questionnaire (n = 58) aimed at identification of procrastinating
parents and results according to its scales. It was found that the phenomenon of parental
procrastination is clearly manifested in 16.9% of respondents. The discussion of the
results of postponing children’s affairs is carried out from the position of agency in
relation to a child.
Keywords: parental procrastination, questionnaire, pilot study, agency, interaction
with a child.
References
1. Arpent’yeva M. R. Prokrastinatsiya: kompleks Iony // Rol’ prokrastinatsii v protsesse samoopredeleniya molodezhi: sbornik nauchnykh statey. Saratov: Izd-vo «Saratovskiy istochnik», 2015. S. 5–25.
2. Zobkov A. V. K probleme prokrastinatsii roditeley vo vzaimodeystvii s det’mi // Sibirskiy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal. 2020. No 77. S. 90-110. DOI: 10.17223/17267080/77/5
3. Zobkov V. A. Genezis otnosheniya cheloveka k sebe. Vladimir: Izd-vo VlGU, 2018. 172 s.
4. Zolotareva A. A. Differentsial’naya diagnostika perfektsionizma // Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal. 2013. T. 34. No 2. S. 117–128.
5. Kornienko D. S., Rudnova N. A. Osobennosti ispol’zovaniya sotsial’nykh setey v svyazi s prokrastinatsiey i samoregulyatsiey // Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2018. T. 11. No 59. S. 9.
6. Puretskiy M. M. Samoregulyatsiya i vremya // Vestnik universiteta (Gosudarstvennyi universitet upravleniya). 2015. No 8. S. 303–307.
7. Rudnova N. A. Kharakteristiki samoregulyatsii deyatel’nosti kak faktory prokrastinatsii // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya. 2018. Vyp. 4 (36). S. 550–561. DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2018-4-550-561.
8. Chernysheva N. A. Prokrastinatsiya: aktual’noe sostoyanie problemy i perspektivy izucheniya // Vestnik Permskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarno-pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Ser. No 1. Psikhologicheskie i pedagogicheskie nauki. Vyp. 1 / red. kol.: E. A. Silina (otv. red. vyp.), A. A. Volochkov, T. V. Evtukh (otv. sekretar’ vyp.); Perm. gos. gumanit.-ped. un-t. Perm’, 2016 a. S. 17–26. URL: http://vestnik1.pspu.ru/files/1-2016-1.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 15.04.2021).
9. Ferrari J. R., Johnson J. L., McCown W. G. Procrastination and task avoidance: Theory, research and treatment. New York: Plenum Press, 1995. 288 p.
10. Janis I., Mann L. Decisioning, A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. New York, The Free Press, A division of Macmillan Inc. 1979. Vol. 73, iss. 1. pp. 213–214.
11. Katz I., Eilot K., Nevo N. “I’ll do it later”: Type of motivation, self-efficacy and homework procrastination // Motivation and Emotion. 2014. V. 38 (1). pp. 111-119. DOI: 10.1007/s11031-013-9366-1
12. Milgram N. A., Sroloff B., Rosenbaum M. The procrastination of everyday life // Journal of Research in Personality. 1988. V. 22 (2). pp. 197-212. DOI: 10.1016/0092-6566(88)90015-3
13. Steel P. The nature of procrastination: a meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential selfregulation failure // Psychological bulletin. 2007. V. 133 (1). pp. 65-94. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65
Price: 0 рублей
To order