LoginRegistration
For instance: Humanities and Science University Journal
About consortium subscription Contacts
(812) 4095364 Non-commercial partnership
St. Petersburg
university
consortium

Articles

The Scientific Opinion №5 (Psycho-pedagogical and philosophy of science), 2021

DIAGNOSTICS OF STUDENTS’ ATTITUDE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THEIR CREATIVITY BY MEANS OF UNIVERSITY E-LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

L. A. Darinskaya, A. N. Oskina
Price: 0 руб.
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25807/22224378_2021_5_81
The article presents a comparative analysis of the research results of 2019 and 2020–
2021, conducted in the form of semi-structured interviews and a questionnaire among
socio-humanities bachelor students in order to identify their attitude to creativity
development by means of university e-learning environments. As a result of the
analysis, it is clear that there has been an increase in the positive attitude of students
towards the issue. We associate this change with the new learning experience received
by the students due to the transition to e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic
in 2020–2021.
Keywords: e-learning, digitalisation of education, creative pedagogy, higher education,
standardisation.
References
1. O proekte «Sovremennaya tsifrovaya obrazovatel’naya sreda v Rossiyskoy Federatsii». URL: http://neorusedu.ru/about (data obrashcheniya: 01.04.2021).
2. Os’kina A. N., Darinskaya L. A. Issledovanie otnosheniya studentov k tekhnologiyam tvorcheskogo razvitiya v traditsionnoy i elektronnoy informatsionnoy obrazovatel’noy srede vuza // Psikhologiya XXI veka: metodologiya psikhologicheskoy nauki i praktiki. 2020. S. 172–173.
3. Programma «Tsifrovaya ekonomika Rossiyskoy Federatsii». URL: https://digital.gov.ru/uploaded/files/natsionalnaya-programma-tsifrovaya-ekonomika-rossijskoj-federatsii_NcN2nOO.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 01.04.2021).
4. Chapaev N. i dr. Kreativnaya pedagogika: problemy, protivorechiya, puti ikh razresheniya // Obrazovanie i nauka. 2011. No. 10. S. 30–40.
5. Barrow L. H. (2006). A brief history of inquiry: From Dewey to standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(3), Р. 265–278.
6. Gajda A., Karwowski M., Beghetto R. A. Creativity and academic achievement: A meta-analysis //Journal of Educational Psychology. 2017. Т. 109. No. 2. Р. 269.
7. Harris Anne. Creativity and Education / Anne Harris // Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. 133 p.
8. Karnes M. B. et al. Factors associated with underachievement and overachievement of intellectually gifted children //Exceptional Children. 1961. Т. 28. No. 4. Р. 167–175.
9. MacLaren I. The contradictions of policy and practice: Creativity in higher education //London Review of Education. 2012. Т. 10. No. 2. Р. 159–172.
10. Manovich L. Post-media aesthetics // Transmedia Frictions, The Digital, the Arts, and the Humanities. 2001. 416 р.
11. Simonton D. K. (2016). Big-C Versus Little-c Creativity: Definitions, Implications, and Inherent Educational Contradictions. Creativity Theory and Action in Education, Р. 3–19. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21924-0_1
12. Zhou J., Shen J., Wang X., Neber H., & Johji I. (2013). A cross-cultural comparison: Teachers’ conceptualizations of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 25(3), Р. 239–247.
Price: 0 рублей
To order