LoginRegistration
For instance: Humanities and Science University Journal
About consortium subscription Contacts
(812) 4095364 Non-commercial partnership
St. Petersburg
university
consortium

Articles

The Scientific Opinion №11 (Psycho-pedagogical and philosophy of science), 2020

LANGUAGE INTUITION AS A BARRIER FOR FOREIGN LANGUAGE ACQUISITION. COMPARING THE CONCEPTS OF LINGUISTIC INTUITION AND METALINGUISTIC AWARENESS

N. S. Brem
Price: 0 руб.
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25807/PBH.22224378.2020.12.76.81
The  study  is  aimed  to  compare  two  methods  of  presenting  linguistic  information: 
(1)  rational-sensing,  which  is  based  on  explicit  knowledge  and  demands  conscious reꥢection about the language and (2) random-intuitive, based on implicit knowledge, 
which is gained subconsciously through interaction with the language in the real-life 
communication. In this regard, the author introduces two terms: linguistic intuition and 
metalinguistic awareness. Several denitions of metalinguistic awareness are analysed 
and a translation of this term into Russian is suggested. Based on the review and analysis of literature, mechanisms of linguistic intuition are described in a foreign and native languages. The author comes to the conclusion that on the beginning levels of language prociency success of learning the language is mostly inꥢuenced by learning strategies, foreign language aptitude and language learning disabilities. Linguistic intuition in a non-native  language  develops  a  bit  later  as  more  language  material  is  accumulated, systemised and automised.
Key words: linguistic intuition, language aptitude, metalinguistic ability, metalinguistic 
awareness, barrier in learning, foreign languages, metalanguage.
References
1. Belyaev B. V. Ocherki po psikhologii obucheniya inostrannym yazykam: posobie dlya prepodavateley i studentov. M.: Prosveshchenie, 1965. 226 s.
2. Bozhovich E. D. O funktsiyakh chuvstva yazyka v reshenii shkol’nikami semantiko-sintaksicheskikh zadach // Voprosy psikhologii. 1988. № 4. S. 70–78.
3. Gokhlerner M. M., Eyger G. V. Psikhologicheskiy mekhanizm chuvstva yazyka // Voprosy psikhologii. 1983. T. 4. S. 137–141.
4. Orlova A. M. K voprosu ob ob’yektivnoy obuslovlennosti tak nazyvaemogo «chuvstva yazyka» // Voprosy psikhologii. 1955. № 5. S. 38–45.
5. Shcherba L. V. Prepodavanie inostrannykh yazykov v sredney shkole. Obshchie voprosy metodiki. M., 1974. 112 s.
6. Dunger H., Scheffler K. Zur Schärfung des Sprachgefühls: 225 fehlerhafte Sätze mit Verbessergn und sprachl. Bemerkungen, geprüft von e. Ausschusse d. Deutschen Sprachvereins. Verlag der Allgemeinen Deutschen Sprachvereins, 1927. 164 S.
7. Frohne G. Bemerkungen zu Sprachbewußtsein und Sprachgefühl // Textlinguistik. 1986. Heft 13. S. 59–62.
8. Gombert J. E. Metalinguistic development. University of Chicago Press, 1992.
9. Henne H. Der Berufung wird stattgegeben. Plädoyer für die Entwicklung von Sprachgefühl // Sprachgefühl? Vier Antworten auf eine Preisfrage. Ist Berufung auf „Sprachgefühl“ berechtigt? / ed. H. Gauger. Heidelberg, 1982. S. 91–137.
10. Kainz F. Psychologie der Sprache. Spezielle Sprachpsychologie, 1956. 537 S.
11. Oxford Rebecca. Language learning strategies. What every teacher should know. Heinle & Heinle Publishers, 1990.
12. Roehr K. Metalinguistic knowledge and language ability in university level L2 learners // Applied Linguistics. 2007. 29(2). P. 173–199.
13. Woll N. How French speakers reflect on their language: a critical look at the concept of metalinguistic awareness // Language awareness. 2019. Т. 28. №. 1. P. 49–73.
 
Price: 0 рублей
To order