LoginRegistration
For instance: Humanities and Science University Journal
About consortium subscription Contacts
(812) 4095364 Non-commercial partnership
St. Petersburg
university
consortium

Articles

The Scientific Opinion. Economic, juridical and sociological sciences №1, 2019

THE METHOD OF CROSS-CULTURAL ANALYSIS IN TEACHING DECORATIVE AND APPLIED ARTS TO UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS

I. L. Nabok, L. V. Sanzheeva
Price: 50 руб.
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25807/PBH.22224378.2018.9.65.71
The  article  is  devoted  to  the  method  of  cross-cultural  analysis,  which  is  one  of  the 
effective ways of teaching. A comparative analysis of the elements of decorative and 
applied arts is carried out using the example of Zhostovo painting and kumalan. In the 
process of comparative analysis, a student involves psychological mechanisms: attention, 
memorisation, and reproduction. Emotional and sensory perception is combined with the 
formation of key concepts associated with the identi옟cation of decorative and applied 
arts. The method of cross-cultural analysis enables undergraduate students to effectively 
use the knowledge gained in accordance with the pedagogical competence in higher 
education.
Key words: cross-cultural analysis, teaching methods, cross-cultural analysis method, 
decorative and applied arts, Zhostovo painting, kumalan.
References
1. Bergel’son M. B. Mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya kak issledovatel’skaya programma: lingvistich-
eskie metody issledovaniya kross-kul’turnykh vzaimodeystviy // Vestnik MGU. Seriya 19: «Lingvistika i 
mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya». 2001. T. 4. URL: http://www.russcomm.ru/rca_biblio/b/bergelson_pub-
lications.shtml (data obrashcheniya: 02.07.2018).
2. Boldyrev B. V. Slovar’ evenkiyskogo govora amurskikh evenkov. Blagoveshchensk. 2009. 91 s.
3. Vaynshteyn S. I. Sravnitel’nyi metod // Kul’turologiya XX vek. Entsiklopediya. T. 2. SPb.: Universitet-
skaya kniga, 1998. 907 s.
4. Verbitskiy A. A., Zhukova N. V., Zhukova N. Yu. Kross-kul’turnye konteksty obrazovaniya // Vestnik 
Mosk. gos. lingvist. un-ta. Obrazovanie i pedagogicheskie nauki. 2007. № 531. S. 73–90.
5. Vezhbitskaya A. Ponimanie kul’tur cherez posredstvo klyuchevykh slov / per. s angl. A. D. Shmeleva. 
M.: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury, 2001. 288 s.
6. Zhostovskaya rospis’ // Zhostovo s 1825 goda. URL: http://zhostovo.ru/page/jostovo (data obrash-
cheniya: 02.07.2018).
7. Matyash N. V. Innovatsionnye pedagogicheskie tekhnologii: proektnoe obuchenie: uchebnoe posobie 
dlya uchrezhdeniy vysshego professional’nogo obrazovaniya. M.: Izd. tsentr «Akademiya», 2012. 156 s.
8. Myasoedov S. P., Borisova L. G. Kross-kul’turnyi menedzhment: uchebnik. M.: Yurayt, 2017. 314 s. 
9. Nabok I. L. Mezhetnicheskoe obshchenie kak fenomen kul’tury // Nauchnoe mnenie. 2015. № 2–1.  
S. 29–33.
10. Sanzheyeva L. V. Aktivnye i interaktivnye metody obucheniya na zanyatiyakh po distsipline «Mirovaya 
khudozhestvennaya kul’tura» // Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya. Pedagogika. 2012. № 4 (17). S. 6–9.
11. Fokin Yu. G. Prepodavanie i vospitanie v vysshey shkole: metodologiya, tseli i soderzhanie, tvorchest-
vo: uchebnoe posobie dlya studentov vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. M.: Izd. tsentr «Akademiya», 2002. 
224 s.
12. Berry J., Poortinga Y., Segall M., Dasen P. Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications. 
Cambridge, 1992. 588 p.
13. Bochner S. The social psychology of cross-cultural relations // Cultures in contact. Oxford, 1982. 
P. 5–44.
14. Malinowski В. А. ScientiBc theory of culture // ScientiBc theory of culture, and other essays Chapel 
Hill. 1944. P. 36–42.
 
Price: 50 рублей
To order