E. A. Davydova
Price: 50 руб.
Varvara Grigorievna Kuznetsova is a Soviet ethnographer, who conducted fieldwork in Chukotka in 1948–1951. The article analyses her field diaries deposited at the archives of Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography of the Russian Academy of Sciences as an ethnographic source. Firstly, the author emphasizes the approach by V. G. Kuznetsova to the field work, which was innovative for her time. Secondly, the author argues that this source is valuable for modern ethnologists/anthropologists, in particular, for understanding the power hierarchy in the Chukchi society.
Key words: Chukotka, field diaries, ethnographic source, methodology.
REFERENCES
1. Arkhiv Muzeya antropologii i etnografii (Kunstkamera) (AMAE). F. K-2. Op. 2.
D. 340. 59 l.
2. AMAE. F. K-2. Op. 2. D. 389. 33 l.
3. AMAE. F. K-2. Op. 2. D. 403. 37 l.
4. Burd’ye P. Prakticheskiy smysl. SPb.: Aletey'ya, 2001. 562 s.
5. Vul’f K. Antropologiya vospitaniya. M.: Izdatel’skaya gruppa «Praksis», 2012.
295 s.
6. Vul’f K. Vvedenie. Novoe otkrytie emotsiy // Chuvstvo. Telo. Dvizhenie. M.:
«Kanon» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2011. S. 7–39.
7. Vul’f K. K genezisu sotsial'nogo: mimezis, performativnost’, ritual. SPb.:
Intersotsis, 2009. 164 s.
8. Koz’min V. A. Etnograficheskiy istochnik i polevaya etnografiya // Istoricheskaya
etnografiya. SPb., 1993. Vyp. 3. S. 152–159.
9. Kuznetsova V. G. Iz neopublikovannykh materialov Chukotskoy ekspeditsii
1948–1951 gg. // Materialy polevykh etnograficheskikh issledovaniy. SPb., 2004.
Vyp. 5. S. 136–162.
10. Kuznetsova V. G. Predvaritel'noe soobshchenie o poezdke k chukchamolenevodam rayona Amguemy // AMAE. F. K-1. Op. 2. D. 404. 7 l.
11. Moss M. Tekhniki tela // Obshchestvo. Obmen. Lichnost': trudy po sotsial’noy
antropologii. M.: KDU, 2011. S. 304-325.
12. Fuko M. Nadzirat' i nakazyvat': rozhdenie tyur'my. M.: Izd-vo «Ad Marginem»,
1999. 478 s.
13. Bank L. Beyond the Verandah: Fieldwork, locality and the production of
knowledge in a South African city // Locating the field: Space, place and context in
antropology. Oxford-New York: Berg, 2006. P. 43–66.
14. Benjamin W. Moscow diary // October. 1985. Vol. 35. P. 9–135.
15. Briggs J. Never in anger: Portrait of an Eskimo family. Cambridge,
Massachusetts, London: Harvard University Press, 1976. P. 10–28.
16. Jackson J. E. “I am a fieldnote”: Fieldnotes as a symbol of professional identity //
Fieldnotes: The making of anthropology. New York: Cornell University Press, 1990.
P. 3–33.
17. Ingold T. Culture and the perception of the environment // Bush Base: forest farm.
Culture, environment and development. London: Routledge, 1992. P. 39–56.
18. Ingold T. The perception of environment. London-New-York: Taylor & Francis
e-Library, 2002.
19. Kristmundsdottir S. D. Far from the Trobriands? Biography as field // Locating
the field: Space, place and context in anthropology. Oxford-New York: Berg, 2006.
P. 163–178.
20. Lederman R. Pretexts for ethnography: On reading fieldnotes // Fieldnotes:
The making of anthropology. New York: Cornell University Press, 1990. P. 71–91.
21. Lee J., Ingold T. Fieldwork on foot: Perceiving, Routing, Socializing // Locating
the field: Space, place and context in anthropology. Oxford-New York: Berg, 2006.
P. 67–86.
22. Nisbett N. The Internet, Cybercafes and new social spaces of Bangalorean
youth // Locating the field: Space, place and context in anthropology. Oxford-New
York: Berg, 2006. P. 129–148.
23. Richter G. The Monstrosity of the body in Walter Benjamin’s “Moscow Diary” //
Modern language studies. 1995. Vol. 25, № 4. P. 85–126.
24. Sanjek R. A vocabulary for fieldnotes // Fieldnotes: The making of anthropology.
New York: Cornell University Press, 1990. P. 92–138.
25. Sanjek R. Preface // Fieldnotes: The making of anthropology. New York: Cornell
University Press, 1990. P. XI–XVIII.
