LoginRegistration
For instance: Humanities and Science University Journal
About consortium subscription Contacts
(812) 4095364 Non-commercial partnership
St. Petersburg
university
consortium

Articles

"The Scientific Opinion" № 6 (Psycho-pedagogical and Juridical sciences), 2015

INTERRELATION OF ADOLESCENTS’ CREATIVITY AND AGGRESSIVENESS

E. I. Nikolaeva, E. M. Belyaeva
Price: 50 руб.
 The purpose of the investigation was to compare the aggressiveness parameters of junior adolescents with different levels of creativity. 158 schoolchildren of 6–7 forms (61 boys, 97 girls) were participants. All children were divided into two groups using the results of the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking (adaptation of E. Tunik, 2002): those having the creativity level higher or lower than the average. The Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory (adaptation by I. Dermanova, 2002) was used for aggressiveness parameters evaluation, and the Spielberger questionnaire (adaptaion by Andreyeva, 2002) demonstrated the anxiety level. The authors of the paper showed that the high creativity level correlates with low levels of aggressiveness, and did not reveal any distinctions in anxiety levels of adolescents of different groups.
Key words: creativity, anxiety, aggressiveness, anxiety, adolescents.
References
1. Andreyeva A. D. Oprosnik issledovaniya trevozhnosti u starshikh podrostkov i yunoshey (Ch. D. Spilberger, adaptatsiya A. D. Andreyeva) // Diagnostika emotsional’no-nravstvennogo razvitiya / red. i sost. I. B. Dermanova. SPb., 2002. S. 75–80.
2. Asmolov A. G. Psikhologiya razvitiya lichnosti. Kul’turno-istoricheskoe ponimanie razvitiya cheloveka. M.: NPF Smysl, 2007.
3. Vygotskiy L. S. Psikhologiya iskusstva. M.: Kniga po trebovaniyu, 2012.
4. Vygotskiy L. S. Myshlenie i rech’. M.: Labirint, 2012.
5. Guggenbyul’ A. Zloveshcheye ocharovanie nasiliya. Profilaktika detskoy agressivnosti i zhestokosti i bor’ba s nimi / per. s nem. SPb., 2000.
6. Diagnostika sostoyaniya agressii (oprosnik Bassa — Darki) // Diagnostika emotsional’no-nravstvennogo razvitiya / red. i sost. I. B. Dermanova. SPb., 2002. S. 80–84.
7. Lorents K. Agressiya (tak nazyvaemoe «zlo») / per. s nem. M.: Progress; Univers, 1994.
8. Nikolaeva E. I., Vergunov E. G. Prognoz psikhofiziologicheskoy «stoimosti» effektivnosti protsessa obucheniya u starshikh shkol’nikov // Psikhologiya obrazovaniya v polikul’turnom prostranstve. 2013. T. 1. № 21. S. 47–52.
9. Nikolaeva E. I. Psikhologiya detskogo tvorchestva. 2-e izd. SPb: Piter, 2010. 240 s.
10. Nikolaeva E. I., Gadzhibabaeva D. R. Sravnitel’nyi analiz lichnostnykh osobennostey podrostkov, prozhivayushchikh v sem’ye i v internate (na primere Dagestana) // Psikhologiya obrazovaniya v polikul’turnom prostranstve. 2011. T. 2. № 14. S. 70–73.
11. Rays F., Doldzhin K. Psikhologiya podrostkovogo i yunosheskogo vozrasta / per s angl. E. I. Nikolaevoy. SPb: Piter, 2010. 810 s.
12. Tunik E. Psikhodiagnostika tvorcheskogo myshleniya. Kreativnye testy. M.: Didaktika plyus, 2002.
13. Fromm E. Anatomiya chelovecheskoy destruktivnosti. M., 2010. 624 s.
14. Torrance E. P. A longitudinal examination of the fourth grade slump in creativity // Gifted Child Quarterly. 1968. V. 12. P. 195–199.
Price: 50 рублей
To order