The paper presents the results of the research on ideas of students of different age groups about the dangers of future professional activity and parameters that affect safety of the social-psychological space of educational and vocational activity. The author shows the specificity of ideas about a profession’s danger degree, about factors mainly determining safety of professional activities, and about associations with a sense of danger. The paper covers the differences in the degree of impact on safety of the social and psychological space of parameters characterising the psychological climate and professional environment, information security, responsibility and ergonomic aspects of environmental conditions. The author also analyses individual psychological differences of age groups.
social-psychological space, individual psychological characteristics.
References
1. Baeva I. A. [i dr.]. Psikhologiya bezopasnosti kak teoreticheskaya osnova gumanitarnykh tekhnologiy
v sotsial’nom vzaimodeystvii / pod red. I. A. Baevoy. SPb.: Izd-vo RGPU im. A. I. Gertsena, 2007.
2. Bodalev A. A., Vasina N. V. Poznanie cheloveka chelovekom. Vozrastnoy, gendernyi, etnicheskiy i
professional’nyi aspekty. SPb.: Rech’, 2005.
3. Gayazova L. A. Obespechenie kompleksnoy bezopasnosti obrazovatel’noy sredy i eyo psikhologicheskoe
soprovozhdenie // Izvestiya RGPU im. A. I. Gertsena. 2011. № 142. S. 27–33.
4. Gutsykova S. V. Metod ekspertnykh otsenok. Teoriya i praktika. M.: Izd-vo «Institut psikhologii
RAN», 2011.
5. Gutsykova S. V. Vzaimosvyaz’ integrativnykh professional’no vazhnykh kachestv i lichnostnykh
kharakteristik spetsialistov s raznoy effektivnost’yu deyatel’nosti: dis. kand. ps. nauk. M.: Institut psikhologii
RAN, 2012.
6. Gutsykova S. V. Kompleksnaya otsenka predstavleniy o kul’ture bezopasnosti studentov khimikotekhnologicheskogo
vuza // Vestnik RKhTU im. D. I. Mendeleyeva: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’noekonomicheskie
issledovaniya: v 2 t. Tom 1. Gumanitarnye issledovaniya / otv. red. N. N. Gorbonos. Vyp.
IV. M.: RKhTU im. D. I. Mendeleyeva, 2013. S. 106–122.
7. Zhuravlev A. L., Kupreychenko A. B. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskoe prostranstvo lichnosti. M.: Izd-vo
«Institut psikhologii RAN», 2012.
8. Problemy psikhologicheskoy bezopasnosti lichnosti: teoreticheskie i eksperimental’nye issledovaniya /
R. Aguzumtsyan, S. Amiryan, V. Papoyan, E. Muryadyan. D. Sargsyan. Er.: Izd-vo EGU, 2013.
9. Carmeli A., Brueller D., Dutton J. E. Learning behaviours in the workplace: the role of high-quality
interpersonal relationships and psychological safety//Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 2009.
V. 26. P. 81–98.
10. Conchie S. M., Donald I. J., Taylor P. J. Trust: Missing Piece(s) in the Safety Puzzle// Risk Analysis.
2006. V. 26(5). Р. 1097–1104.
11. Neal A., Griffin M. A., Hart, P. M. The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and
individual behaviour//Safety Science. 2000. V. 34. P. 99–109.
12. Singh B., Wijk K., Lindberg P. A comparison of managers’ and safety delegates’ perceptions of work
environment priorities in the manufacturing industry // Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing
and Service Industries. 2012. V. 22. P. 235–247.
13. Smith-Crowe K., Burke M. J., Landis R. S. Organizational climate as a moderator of safety knowledge–safety performance relationships // Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2003. V. 24 (7). Р. 861–876.
