For instance: The Scientific Opinion
About consortium subscription Contacts
(812) 4095364 Non-commercial partnership
St. Petersburg


"Humanities and Science University Journal" № 7, 2014

Psychometric Analysis of the «Attitudes Towards Statistics and Concerns Regarding the Study of Statistics” (OSTI) Questionnaire

A. A. Alexeyev, E. P. Kazikova, E. S. Talasbayeva, V. V. Shevelev
Price: 50 руб.
The article highlights the results of the psychometric analysis of the «Attitude towards statistics and concern regarding study of statistics” (OSTI) questionnaire, which is
a Russian language version of the STARS questionnaire. The so-called “fear of statistics” phenomenon and the methods of its measurement are being explored. Authors present a comparison of the psychometric parameters of OSTI with
the relevant STARS characteristics, which permits to reveal the specifi cs of the attitudes of Russian students towards study of statistics, as well as outline measures for the further improvement of OSTI questionnaire.
Keywords: OSTI and STARS questionnaires, fear of statistics, study of statistics by students, concern, psychometric analysis of OSTI.
1. Alekseyev A. A. Zemlya kruglaya (p < 0,05): Bayes, Fisher i drugie //
Metodologicheskie problemy meditsinskoy psikhologii: materialy seminara kafedry
klinicheskoy psikhologii Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gertsena. Chast’ II: 2010–2012 gg. / RGPU im. A. I. Gertsena; pod nauch. red. A. N. Alyokhina. SPb.: Znanie, 2012. S. 69–88.
2. Alekseyev A. A., Kazikova E. P., Talasbaeva E. S., Shevelev V. V. Adaptatsiya
oprosnika Statistics anxiety rating scale (STARS) na vyborke rossiyskiy studentovpsikhologov // Aktual’nye napravleniya fundamental’nykh i prikladnykh issledovaniy: materialy III mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. 2014. T. 1. S. 100–104.
3. Baloglu M. (2003). Individual differences in statistics anxiety among college
students. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 855–865.
4. Cumming G. (2014). The New Statistics: Why and How. Psychological Science,
25 (1), 7–29.
5. Hanna D., Shevlin M., Dempster M. (2008). The structure of the statistics anxiety
rating scale: A confi rmatory factor analysis using UK psychology students. Personality
and Individual Differences, 45, 68–74.
6. Liu S., Onwuegbuzie A., Meng L. (2011). Examination of the score reliability
and validity of the statistics anxiety rating scale in a Chinese population: Comparisons
of statistics anxiety between Chinese college students and their Western counterparts.
Journal of Educational Enquiry, 11, 1, 29–42.
7. Onwuegbuzie A. J., Wilson V. A. (2003). Statistics anxiety: Nature, etiology, antecedents, effects, and treatments. A comprehensive review of the literature. Teaching in Higher Education, 8, 195–209.
8. Papousek I., Ruggeri K., Macher D., Paechter M. et al. (2012). Psychometric
Evaluation and Experimental Validation of the Statistics Anxiety Rating Scale. Journal
of Personality Assessment, 94 (1), 82–91.
9. Peter K. H. Chew and Denise B. Dillon (2014). Statistics Anxiety Update: Refi ning
the Construct and Recommendations for a New Research Agenda. Perspectives on
Psychological Science, 9(2), 196–208.
10. Sax L. J. (1994). Mathematical Self-Concept: How College Reinforces the Gender
Gap. Research in Higher Education, 35(2), 141–166.
11. Schneider W. R. (2011). The Relationship Between Statistics Self-Effi cacy, Statistics Anxiety, and Performance in an Introductory Graduate Statistics Course. Graduate School Theses and Dissertations, 1–1, 59–62.
12. Teman E. D. (2013). Factorial invariance of the statistical anxiety rating scale
across sex and students’ classifi cation. Comprehensive Psychology, 2, 1, 2.
13. Zeidner M. (1991). Statistics and mathematics anxiety in social science students
— some interesting parallels. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61,
Price: 50 рублей
To order