Price: 50 руб.
Статья написана на английском языке
Предложенная Крейбиллом оценка валидности списка (инвентаря) конфликтных стилей использовалась достаточно часто в качестве прикладного инструмента для идентификации конфликтных стилей в низкострессовых и высокострессовых ситуациях. Однако в предыдущих исследованиях предлагаемый подход не анализировался с точки зрения надежности или валидности. Данная статья пред-
лагает оценку инвентаря путем определения уровня надежности, внутреннего постоянства и параллелизма. Результаты подтверждают, что список из 40 характеристик является надежным и валидным инструментом. Обсуждается возможность использования результатов исследования при оценке конфликтных стилей.
Ключевые слова: конфликтный стиль, конфликтный инвентарь, надежность, валидность, анализ на основе подкрепляющего фактора.
СПИСОК ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ:
1. Bermudez, J. Maria, Reyes, NenetzinA., and Karen S. Wampler. 2006. Confl ict resolution styles among Latino couples.Journal of Couple and Relationship Theory. 5 (4): 1–21.
2. Blake, Robert, and Jane Mouton. 1964. The managerial grid: The key to leadership excellence. Houston: Gulf Publishing Co.
3. Cronbach, Lee. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 16(3): 297-334.
4. Davis, Mark, Capobiano, Sal, and Linda Kraus. 2004. Measuring confl ict-related behaviors: Reliability and validity evidence regarding the Confl ict Dynamics Profi le. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 64(4): 707–731.
5. Gilmore, Susan, and Patrick Fraleigh. 1992. Style profi le for communication at work.
Eugene, OR: Friendly Press.
6. Gomez, Edwin. N.D. An argument for an ethnicity and recreation model via confi rmatory factor analysis and path analysis measures. Unpublished manuscript. http://corpslakes.usace.army.mil/employees/ethnic/pdfs/gomez.pdf.
7. Gottman, John Mordechai. 1994. What predicts divorce: The relationship between marital process and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Hall, Jay. 1969. Conflict management survey: A survey of one’s characteristic reaction to and handling of conflicts between himself and others. Houston: Teleometrics, Inc.
9. Henningsen, David, Braz, Mary, and Elaine Davies. 2008. Why do we flirt? Flirting
motivations and sex differences in working and social contexts. Journal of Business
Communication.45:483–502.
10. Hofstede, Geert, ed. 1980. Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11. Hunter, John, and David Gerbing. 1982. Unidimensional measurement, second order factor analysis, and causal models // Research inorganizational behavior, eds. BarryStawand Larry L. Cummings, 267–320. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
12. Kilmann, Ralph, and Kenneth Thomas. 1977. Developing a forced-choice measure of confl ict-handling behavior: The “mode” instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 37: 309–325.
13. Kim, Min-Sun, Lee, Hye-Ryeon, Kim, In Duk, and John. E. Hunter. 2004. A test of a
cultural model of confl ict styles. Journal of Asia-Pacifi c Communication.14 (2): 197–222.
14. Kimsey, William, and Rex Fuller. 2003. CONFLICTALK: An instrument for measuring
youth and adolescent confl ict management styles. Confl ict Resolution Quarterly. 21(1): 69–78.
15. King, Wesley, and Edward Miles. 1990. What we know – and don’t know – about measuring confl ict: An examination of the ROC-II and the OCCI confl ict instruments. Management Communication Quarterly. 4 (2): 222–243.
16. Konovsky, Mary, Jaster, Frank, and Mark McDonald. 1989.Using parametric statistics to explore the construct validity of the Thomas-Kilmann Confl ict Mode Survey. Management Communication Quarterly. 3(2): 268–289.
17. Kraybill, Ron. 2005. Style matters: The Kraybill Confl ict Style Inventory. Harrisonburg: RiverhouseePress.
18. Kurdek, Lawrence. 1994. Confl ict resolution styles in gay, lesbian, heterosexual nonparent, and heterosexual parent couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 56: 705–722.
19. Lawrence, Paul, and Jay Lorsch. 1986. Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
20. Leung, Truman,and Min-Sun Kim. 2007. Eight confl ict-handling styles: Validation of
model and instrument. Journal of Asian Pacifi c Communication.17 (2): 173–198.
21. Marin, Mary, Sherblom, John,and Therese Shipps. 1994. Contextual infl uences on nurses’ conflict management strategies. Western Journal of Communication. 58: 201–228.
22. Moberg, Philip. 2001. Linking confl ict strategy to the fi ve-factor model: Theoretical and empirical foundations. The International Journal of Confl ict Management.12(1): 47–68.
23. Olekalns, Mara, Putnam, Linda, Weingart, Laurie, and Laurie Metcalf. 2008. Communication processes and confl ict management // The psychology of confl ict and confl ict management in organizations, eds. CarstenDeDreuand Michele Gelfand, 81–114. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum/Taylor and Frances.
24. Papa, Michael,andDavid Canary.1995. Confl ict in organizations: A competency-based approach // Confl ict and organizations: Communicative processes, ed. Anne MaydanNicotera, 153–179. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
25. Papa, Michael,and Elizabeth Natalle. 1989. Gender, strategy selection, and discussion satisfaction in interpersonal confl ict. Western Journal of Speech Communication. 53: 260–272.
26. Putnam, Linda, andCharmaine Wilson, C. E. 1982. Communicative strategies in organizational confl icts: Reliability and validity of a measurement scale. Communication Yearbook.6: 629–682.
27. Rahim, M. Afl azur. 1983. A measure of styles handing interpersonal confl ict. The Academy of Management Journal. 26 (2): 368–376.
28. Rahim, Afl azur, and Thomas Bonoma. 1979. Managing organizational confl ict: A model of diagnosis and intervention. Psychological Reports. 44: 1323–1344.
29. Riverhouse e-press. 2011. Style matters. http://www.riverhouseepress.com/index.
php?option=com_content&view=article&id=48&Itemid=81.
30. Roloff, Michael. 1976. Communication strategies, relationships, and relational changes // Explorations in Interpersonal Communication, ed.Gerald Miller, 173–196. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31. Ross, Roseanna,and Sue DeWine. 1988. Assessing the Ross-DeWine confl ict management message style (CMMS). Management Communication Quarterly.1(3): 389–413.
32. Shockley-Zalabak, Pamela. 1988. Assessing the Hall Confl ict Management Survey.
Management Communication Quarterly.1(3): 302–320.
33. Sternberg, Robert,and Lawrence Soriano. 1984. Styles of confl ict resolution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 47 (1): 117–126.
34. Thomas, Kenneth. 1988. The confl ict-handling modes: Toward more precise theory. Management Communication Quarterly.1 (3): 430–436.
35. Ting-Toomey, Stella, Oetzel, John, and Kimberlie Yee-Jung. 2001. Self-construal types and confl ict management styles. Communication Reports. 14(2): 89–104.
36. Van de Vliert, Evert,and Boris Kabanoff. 1990. Toward theory-based measures of confl ict management. The Academy of Management Journal. 33 (1): 199–209.
37. Van Doorn, Muriel, Branje, Susan, and Wim Meeus. 2007. Longitudinal transmission of confl ict resolution styles from marital relationships to adolescent-parent relationships. Journal of Family Psychology. 21 (3): 426–434.
38. Wilson, Steven,and Michael Waltman. 1988. Assessing the Putnam-Wilson organizational communication confl ict instrument (OCCI). Management Communication Quarterly. 1 (3): 367–388.
39. Womack, Deanna. 1988a. A review of confl ict instruments in organizational settings. Management Communication Quarterly. 1(3): 437–445.
40. Womack, Deanna. 1988b. Assessing the Thomas-Kilmann confl ict MODE survey. Management Communication Quarterly. 1(3): 321–349.
