This paper concerns English-language texts on Soviet art. It considers evaluative phrases made up of ethnonyms (Russian /Moscow, etc.) and names of Western artists. The method of continuous sampling was used to select 50 texts, 35 of which were texts written by native English speakers, and 15 were texts written by native Russian speakers. The analysis showed that the tactic of evaluative comparison with the use of precedent names of the type under consideration is a more common artistic means within art history discourse for native English speakers. It was revealed that phrases of this type function simultaneously on two levels. Although they generally act as a marker 

of positive evaluation, such phrases presuppose the presence of hierarchy within the model itself, since a precedent name is the primary element, relative to which another name is evaluated. 

Keywords: evaluative interpretation; art discourse; quasiallusions; precedent names.

1. Alimuradov O. A., Miletova E. V. Metaforicheskie modeli, verbalizuyushchiesya s 

uchastiem imen prilagatel’nykh i realizuemye v sovremennom angloyazychnom iskusst-

vovedcheskom diskurse // Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki. 2013. № 4 (37). S. 51–60.

2. Bulatova A. P. Lingvo-kognitivnyi analiz iskusstvovedcheskogo diskursa (muzyka, 

arkhitektura): dis. ... kand. fi lol. nauk. M., 1999. S. 44.

3. Gal’perin I. R. Stilistika angliyskogo yazyka. 4-e izd. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1997. 

S. 136–137.

4. Denisova N. V., Domozhilkina E. I. Britanskie vs rossiyskie literaturnye allyuzii v 

sovremennoy angloyazychnoy literature // Sovremennaya anglistika: yazykovaya palitra 

kul’tury. Sankt-Peterburg: Asterion, 2020. S. 157–176.

5. Yelina E. A. Verbal’nye interpretatsii proizvedeniy izobrazitel’nogo iskusstva 

(nominativno-kommunikativnyi aspekt): dis. ... d-ra fi lol. nauk, Volgograd, 2003. 

6. Yerokhina A. B. Pragmalingvisticheskie aspekty sovremennogo iskusst-

vovedcheskogo diskursa (na materiale angloyazychnykh tekstov, posvyashchennykh 

izobra zitel’nomu iskusstvu): dis… kand. fi lol. nauk. Moskva, 2018. S. 143.

7. Yerokhina A. B. Spetsifika otsenki v ramkakh sovremennogo kriticheskogo 

iskusstvovedcheskogo diskursa // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2017. 

№10-1 (76). S.108–111.

8. Ipatova A. A. Lingvokul’turologicheskiy analiz allyuziy na imena literaturnykh 

personazhey, avtorov i nazvaniya khudozhestvennykh proizvedeniy (na materiale 

angloyazychnoy literatury) // Vypusknaya kvalifikatsionnaya rabota magistra po 

spetsial’nosti 45.04.02. Sankt-peterburgskiy gosudarstvennyi universitet, 2018.

9. Karasik V. I. O tipakh diskursa // Yazykovaya lichnost’: institutsional’nyi i 

personal’nyi diskurs: Sb. nauch. tr. Volgograd, 2000. S. 5–20.

10. Koval’ O. V. K metodologii izucheniya lingvosemioticheskoy i kul’turnoy spet-

sifi ki kontseptosfery «iskusstva/iskusstvoznaniya» // Traditsiп ta novatsiп u vishchiy 

arkhitekturno-khudozhniy osviti. Khar’kov. Vyp. 1, 2, 3. 2008. S. 40–43.

11. Krasnykh V. V. «Svoy» sredi «Chuzhikh»: mif ili real’nost’? M.: Gnozis, 2003. 

S. 198.

12. Likholetova P. V. Kognitivno-pragmaticheskiy analiz diskursa predmetnoy oblasti 

«zhivopis’»: dis. ... kand. fi lol. nauk: 10.02.19. Krasnodar, 2005. 

14. Miletova E. V. Angloyazychnyi iskusstvovedcheskiy diskurs: priroda i leksi-

cheskoe napolnenie. Tambov: Gramota, 2013. № 4 (22): v 2-kh ch. Ch. II. S. 114–119. 

13. Miletova E. V. K probleme dvoystvennoy prirody sovremennogo angloyazych-

nogo iskusstvovedcheskogo diskursa // Perspektivnye voprosy mirovoy nauki: materialy 

VIII nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (17–25 dekabrya 2012 g., Bolgariya). Sofi ya, 

2012. S. 40–46.

15. Min’yar-Belorucheva A. P., Ovchinnikova N. A. K istorii vozniknoveniya i raz-

vitiya iskusstvovedcheskikh terminov // Vestnik YUUrGU. Seriya: Lingvistika. 2011. 

№ 22 (239). 

16. Moskvin V. P. «Intertekstual’nost’. Ponyatiynyi apparat. Figury, zhanry, stili. M.: 

Nauka-Flinta, 2014. S. 43.

17. Nefedova L. A., Galitskaya O. A. Issledovanie rechevykh markerov v iskusst-

vovedcheskom mediadiskursivnom prostranstve // Vestnik ChelGU. 2018. № 1 (411). 

Filologicheskie nauki. Vyp. III. S. 53–59.

18. Panasyuk I. V. Imena pisateley i literaturnykh personazhey v funktsii allyuziy 

(na materiale khudozhestvennykh i publitsisticheskikh tekstov na angliyskom yazyke) // 

Innovatsionnyi tsentr razvitiya obrazovaniya (ITSRON). Aktual’nye voprosy gumanitar-

nykh nauk v sovremennykh usloviyakh razvitiya strany. Vypusk III. Sbornik nauchnykh 

trudov po itogam mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (11 iyunya, 

2017), g. Kazan’, 2017. S. 34–36.

19. Panasyuk I. V. Imennye allyuzii kak markery iskusstvovedcheskogo diskursa 

(na materiale statey britanskikh gazet o russkoy zhivopisi) // Kognitivnye issledovaniya 

yazyka. M.: In-t yazykoznaniya RAN; Tambov: Izdatel’skiy dom TGU im. G. R. Der-

zhavina, 2020. S. 431–434.

20. Petukhova T. I. Aspekty otsenochnoy interpretatsii v angloyazychnom iskusst-

vovedcheskom diskurse // Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. 2017. S. 283–286.

21. Petukhova T. I. Krasota kak tsennost’ v angloyazychnom iskusstvovedcheskom 

diskurse // Tsennostnaya kartina mira angloyazychnogo sotsiuma / [pod obshch. red. 

E. G. Khomyakovoĭ. ] SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta, 2019. S. 122–136.

22. Razinkina N. M. Funktsional’naya stilistika angliyskogo yazyka. Vysshaya 

shkola, 1989. S. 182.

23. Selivanova O. N. Intertekstual’nost’ kak svoystvo iskusstvovedcheskogo teksta // 

Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo universiteta. 

2006. № 14 (3). S. 220–223.

24. Khasanova Z. S., Miletova E. V, Bugaenko N. P. Nekotorye parametry i kha-

rakteristiki angloyazychnogo spetsializirovannogo iskusstvovedcheskogo diskursa // 

Vestnik BGU. 2014. № 2. S. 397–408. 

25. Ben-Porat Z. The Poetics of Literary Allusion, PTL: A Journal for Descriptive 

Poetics and Theory of Literature 1, 1976. P. 105.

26. Irwin W. What Is an Allusion? The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 59:3, 

2001. P. 287–297.

27. Lennon P. Allusions in the Press: An Applied Linguistic Study. Berlin: Mouton 

de Gruyter, 2004. P. 3–4.

28. Perri C. On alluding // Poetics. The Hague; Paris, 1978. Vol. 7, N 3. P. 289–307.

29. Cumming L. The Russians are coming. / URL: https://www.theguardian.com/

artanddesign/2004/jun/20/art2 / (data obrashcheniya: 25.11.2020).

30. Glover M. Hammer and tickle: The dark humour of Soviet art. / URL: https://

www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/features/hammer-and-tickle-dark-

humour-soviet-art-8348784.html / (data obrashcheniya: 25.11.2020).

31. In the Museum of Russian impressionism opened the exhibition “Russian Monet” 

Nikolai Meshcherin. / URL: http://artrussia.ru/en/artnews/855 / (data obrashcheniya: 

25.11.2020).

32. Kochman A. Ambiguity of Home: Identity and Reminiscence in Marianne 

Werefkin’s Return Home, c. 1909. Nineteenth-Century Art Worldwide 5. / URL: http://

www.19thc-artworldwide.org/spring06/171-ambiguity-of-home-identity-and-reminis-

cence-in-marianne-werefkins-return-home-c-1909 / (data obrashcheniya: 25.11.2020).

33. Moscow’s Banksy: the street art of P183 — in pictures. 2012. / URL: https://

www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/gallery/2012/jan/31/moscow-banksy-p183-in-pict

ures#/?picture=385247865&index=1/ (data obrashcheniya: 25.11.2020).

34. Original ink sketch, a study of historical fi gures. / URL: https://www.abaa.org/

book/1328264389 / (data obrashcheniya: 25.11.2020).

35. Paranyuk V. Painting Light Scientifically: Arkhip Kuindzhi’s Intermedial 

Environment. / URL: https://www.academia.edu/41339854/Painting_Light_Scien-

tifi cally_Arkhip_Kuindzhis_Intermedial_Environment_by_Viktoria_Paranyuk / (data 

obrashcheniya: 25.11.2020).

36. Two Bathers. Pavel Shmarov / URL: http://www.rusimp.su/en/collection/

object/131 / (data obrashcheniya: 25.11.2020).

Price: 0 рублей