LoginRegistration
For instance: Humanities and Science University Journal
About consortium subscription Contacts
(812) 4095300 Non-commercial partnership
St. Petersburg
university
consortium

Articles

The Scientific Opinion №7-8 (Psycho-pedagogical and philosophy of science), 2020

RESEARCH ON THE VALUES OF HIGH-LEVEL MANAGERS

T. N. Kulikova
Price: 0 руб.
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25807/PBH.22224378.2020.9.60.68
The article considers theoretical approaches to defining the concept of value, provides an overview and analysis of ways to form value orientations and factors that affect their development. Based on the Schwartz Value Survey, the key values of high-level managers are defined. The author conducts a comparative analysis of the distribution of values among managers by gender, and studies the ratio of the levels of value orientations in different categories of the population. 
Key words: high-level managers, values, management activities.
References
1. Bakuradze A. B. Klassikatsii tsennostey v kontekste upravlencheskoy deyatel’nosti // Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsial’nykh problem (elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal), 2013. № 9 (29). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/klassikatsii-tsennostey-v-kontekste-upravlencheskoy-deyatelnosti/viewer (data obrashcheniya: 15.07.2020).
2. Belyaev I. A. Tsennostnoe soderzhanie tselostnogo mirootnosheniya // Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2004. № 2. S. 9–13.
3. Bikmetov E. Yu., Golikov S. V., Li S. A. Formirovanie tsennostnykh orientatsiy studentov vuza v otno-shenii professional’noy upravlencheskoy deyatel’nosti // Vestnik PNIPU: sots-ekon. n-ki, 2016. № 3.  S. 49–59.
4. Borisova E. L. Tsennostnye orientatsii kak faktor otnosheniya rukovoditeley k sotrudnikam // Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya, 2017. № 5 (66). S. 270–275. 
5. Bratus’ B. S. Psikhologiya. Nravstvennost’. Kul’tura. M.: Menedzher; Rospedagentstvo, 1994. 60 s.
6. Vil’danov Kh. S. Tsennost’ kak predmet losofskogo poznaniya: avtoref. dis. … d-ra filosof. nauk. Magnitogorsk, 2009. 35 s.
7. Grazhdan V. D. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba kak professional’naya deyatel’nost’. Voronezh: Kvadrat, 1997. 127 s.
8. Gryaznova O. S., Rudneva M. G. Izmerenie bazovykh zhiznennykh tsennostey: sravnenie metodik i rezul’tatov Tsennostnogo issledovaniya Shvartsa i Yevropeyskogo sotsial’nogo issledovaniya // Sotsiologicheskie metody v sovremennoy issledovatel’skoy praktike: sb. nauch. tr. / M.: NIU VShE, 2011. № 8. S. 557.
9. Derkach A. A. Akmeologiya: lichnostnoe i professional’noe razvitie cheloveka: Kn. 2. Akmeologicheskie osnovy upravlencheskoy deyatel’nosti. M.: RAGS, 2000. 536 s.
10. Yelizarov A. N. Tsennostnye orientatsii sem’i kak faktor roditel’sko-yunosheskogo konЗikta: avtoref. ... kand. psikhol. nauk. M., 1995. 23 s.
11. Karandashev V. N. Metodika Shvartsa dlya izucheniya tsennostey lichnosti: kontseptsiya i meto-dicheskoe rukovodstvo. SPb.: Rech’, 2004. 70 s.
12. Kim E. Sh., Kuzevanova A. L. Sistema tsennostnykh orientatsiy v strukture upravlencheskoy deyatel’nosti molodykh rukovoditeley biznes-organizatsiy g. Volgograda: sotsiologicheskiy analiz //  Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Povolzhskiy region. Obshchestvennye nauki. Sotsiologiya, 2019. № 1 (49). S. 77–87.
13. Kobeleva O. V. Psikhologo-akmeologicheskie faktory formirovaniya zhiznennykh tsennostey rukovoditelya: avtoref. …kand. psikhol. nauk. M., 1998. 24 s.
14. Korkina T. A., Shivyryalkina O. S. Professionalizm rukovoditelya: soderzhanie ponyatiya i osobennosti // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2014. № 2 (331). Vyp. 9. S. 84–89. 
15. Krasovskiy Yu. D. Upravlencheskie tsennosti rukovoditeley // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie: Sotsiologiya i zhizn’, 2012. № 2. S. 149–154.
16. Kryukov V. V. Filosofskie interpretatsii problemy tsennostey // Vechnye filosofskie problemy:  sb. nauch. tr. / otv. red. G. A. Antipov. Novosibirsk, 1991. S. 39–53. 
17. Leont’yev D. A. Tsennostnye predstavleniya v individual’nom i gruppovom soznanii: vidy, determinanty i izmeneniya vo vremeni // Psikhologicheskoe obozrenie, 1998. № 1. S. 13–25.
18. Likhacheva E. A. Psikhologo-akmeologicheskie faktory formirovaniya nravstvennykh tsennostey spetsialistov-upravlentsev // Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta: ser. Gumanitarnye nauki, 2009. S. 358–362.
19. Magomedova E. Sh. Teoreticheskie osnovaniya izucheniya tsennostnykh orientatsiy molodykh rukovoditeley biznes-organizatsiy // Logos et Praxis, 2018. T. 17. № 1. S. 80–87.
20. Podol’skaya E. A. Tsennostnye orientatsii i problema aktivnosti lichnosti: Khar’kov, 1991. S. 144.
21. Sinyagin Yu. V., Kobeleva O. V. Psikhologoakmeologicheskie osobennosti formirovaniya zhiznennykh tsennostey rukovoditeley // Mir psikhologii, 1999. № 2. S. 52–63. 
22. Sof’ina V. N. Akmeologicheskaya kontseptsiya razvitiya professional’noy kompetentnosti studentov v sisteme uchebno-nauchno-professional’noy integratsii: monograɞya. SPb.: Sev.-Zap. in-t upr. RANKH-iGS, 2015. 180 s.
23. Fukin A. I. Tsennostnye orientatsii chastnykh predprinimateley i naemnykh rabotnikov // Azimut nauchnykh issledovaniy: pedagogika i psikhologiya., 2014. № 3. S. 77–80.
24. Shepel’ V. M. Vozrastanie tsennosti ɞlosoɞi kak ucheniya ob universal’nykh pravilakh poznaniya // Obrazovatel’nye tekhnologii, 2015. № 2. S. 17–26.
25. Schwartz S. H. Basic human values: Theory, measurement, and applications // Revue Franзaise de Sociologie, 2006. Vol. 47. № 4. P. 249–288.
 
Price: 0 рублей
To order