LoginRegistration
For instance: Humanities and Science University Journal
About consortium subscription Contacts
(812) 4095300 Non-commercial partnership
St. Petersburg
university
consortium

Articles

Humanities and Science University Journal № 40 (Philology and Archaeology, World History, Art History), 2018

PURPOSES OF LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE LEGAL REGULATION MECHANISM: THE NOTION AND CLASSIFICATION

S. V. Sharabanov
Price: 50 руб.
 The article attempts to analyse the existing approaches to understanding the purposes oflegal responsibility in modern times. Various points of view of lawyers and researchers 
are given. The analysis allowed the author to come to the conclusion that the concept of 
a purpose of legal responsibility is not only relevant in the theory of law, but also mul-
tidimensional, and therefore to date there is no generally accepted point of view on this 
legal concept.
Key  words: legal responsibility, purpose of legal responsibility, purpose of individual 
rules of law, purpose of law institutions, purpose of legal sectors, purpose of cross-
sectoral institutions.
References
1. Vitruk N. V. Obshchaya teoriya yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti. M., 2008. 304 s. 
2. Gabrichidze B. N., Chernyavskiy A. G. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost’. M., 2005. 686 s.
3. Kerimov D. A. Svoboda, pravo i zakonnost’. M., 1960. 223 s. 
4. Kerimov D. A. Kategoriya tseli v sovetskom prave // Pravovedenie. 1964. № 3. S. 31–38.
5. Kudryavtsev V. N., Nikitinskiy V. I., Samoshchenko I. S., Glazyrin V. V. Effektivnost’ pravovykh norm. M.: Yurid. lit., 1980. 280 s.
6. Lipinskiy D. A. Problemy yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti. SPb., 2003. 385 s.
7. Mal’ko A. V., Shundikov K. V. Tseli i sredstva v prave i pravovoy politike. Saratov: Izd-vo Sarat. gos. akad. prava, 2003. 294 s.
8. Musatkina A. A. Finansovaya otvetstvennost’: teoreticheskiy i prakticheskiy aspekty. Kazan’, 2008. S. 12–13. 
9. Samoshchenko I. S., Nikitinskiy V. I. Izuchenie effektivnosti deystvuyushchego zakonodatel’stva // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1969. № 8. S. 3–11.
10. Sviridov S. A. Effektivnost’ pravovykh norm o material’noy otvetstvennosti. Voronezh: Izd-vo Voronezh. un-ta, 1982. 120 s.
11. Simonov A. N., Timoshenko I. V. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo: ekspress-spravochnik dlya studentov vuzov. M.: MarT; Rostov n/D: Tsentr MarT, 2007. 315 s. 
12. Sirotin A. S. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost’ po sovetskomu pravu // Problemy otvetstvennosti i nakazaniya v sovetskom prave: sb. nauch. tr. M.: VYuZI, 1990. S. 3–18.
13. Sobchak A. A. O nekotorykh spornykh voprosakh obshchey teorii pravovoy otvetstvennosti // Pravovedenie. 1968. № 1. S. 49–57.
14. Tarbagaev A. N. Ponyatie i tseli ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti. Krasnoyarsk: Izd-vo Krasnoyar. un-ta, 1986. 120 s.
15. Chirkov A. P. Otvetstvennost’ v sisteme zakonodatel’stva: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1989. 26 s.
16. Shaburov A. S. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost’. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava / pod red. V. M. Korel’skogo i V. D. Perevalova. M., 1998. 520 s.
17. Shindyapina M. D. Stadii yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti. M.: Knizhnyi mir, 1998. 168 s.
Price: 50 рублей
To order