interaction styles. Bullying is measured with the Olweus Bully/Victim

Questionnaire, and interaction styles are studied according to I. Sokolov’s “Styles

of Pedagogical Interaction”. The study took place in 2 secondary schools of Nizhny

Novgorod. The total sample numbered 348 students of 7th–9th forms and 80 teachers.

The results revealed that in schools, where the teacher-student interaction style is

more controlled and benevolent, a higher number of children are not involved in

bullying, and there are less victims, offenders and witnesses. Children from these

schools are less afraid of bullying, and adults are more likely to stop bullying in case

it happens.

Key words: bullying, teacher-student interaction styles, occurrence of bullying,

educational environment.

1. Amonashvili Sh. A. Lichnostno-gumannaya osnova pedagogicheskogo protsessa. Minsk: Izd-vo Universitetskoe, 1990. 560 s.

2. Bochaver A. A., Khlomov K. D. Bulling kak ob’yekt issledovaniy i kul’turnyi fenomen // Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. Moskva, 2013. T. 10. S. 149–159.

3. Volkova E. N. Sub’yektnost’ pedagoga: teoriya i praktika: diss. na soisk. uchen. st. d-ra psikhol. nauk. M., 1998. 308 s.

4. Vygotskiy L. S. Sobranie sochineniy: v 6 t. / pod red. D. B. El’konina. M.: Pedagogika, 1984. T. 4. Detskaya psikhologiya. 433 s.

5. Kalinina R., Gribanova D., Maksimenkova L. Polovozrastnye osobennosti predstavleniy o bullinge sredi shkol’nikov // Obshchestvo. Integratsiya. Obrazovanie. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii 27–28 maya, 2016. T. 1. Rezekne: Rezeknenskaya akademiya tekhnologiy, 2016. S. 377–387.

6. Karabanova O. A. Ponyatie «Sotsial’naya situatsiya razvitiya» v sovremennoy psikhologii // Metodologiya i istoriya psikhologii. M., 2007. T. 2. Vyp. 4. S. 40–56.

7. Leont’yev A. A. Pedagogicheskoe obshchenie. M.: Znanie, 1979. 48 s.

8. Orlov A. B. Problemy perestroyki psikhologo-pedagogicheskoy podgotovki uchitelya // Voprosy psikhologii. M., 1988. № 1. S. 16–26.

9. Petrosyants V. R. Psikhologicheskaya kharakteristika starsheklassnikov, uchastnikov bullinga v obrazovatel’noy srede i ikh zhiznestoykost’: diss. na soisk. uchen. st. kand. psikh. nauk. SPb., 2011. 210 s.

10. Safronova M. V. Bulling v obrazovatel’noy srede — mify i real’nost’ // Mir nauki, kul’tury i obrazovaniya. Gorno-Altaysk, 2014. № 3 (46). S. 182–185.

11. Sobkin V. S., Smyslova M. M. Bulling v stenakh shkoly: vliyanie sotsiokul’turnogo konteksta (po materialam krosskul’turnogo issledovaniya) // Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo. M., 2014. № 2. T. 5. S. 71–86.

12. Baumrind D. The discipline controversy revisited // Family Relations. 1996. 45: Vol. 4. pp. 405–416.
13. Cook C. R. [et al.] Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: A metaanalytic investigation // School Psychology Quarterly. 2010. 25. pp. 65–83.

14. Finkelhor D., Ormrod R., Turner H. Poly-victimization: A neglected component in child victimization // Child Abuse & Neglect. 2007. pp. 7–26.

15. Harel-Fisch Y. [et al.] Negative school perceptions and involvement in school bullying: A universal relationship across 40 countries // Journal of Adolescence. 2011. 34. pp. 639–652.

16. Oetting E. R., Donnermeyer J. F. Primary socialization theory: the etiology of drug use and deviance // Substance use & misuse. 1998. 4: Vol. 33. pp. 995–1026.

17. Olweus D. The Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Bergen, Norway: University of Bergen, 1986.

18. Sullivan K., Cleary M, Sullivan G. Bullying in secondary schools: What it looks like and how to manage it. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 2004. 255 pp.

19. Sutherland E. H., Cressey D. R. The theory of differential association // Theories of deviance (5th ed.) / book auth. Traub S. H. and Little C. B. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock Publishers, Inc., 1999. 748 pp.