A. V. Schwabskaya
Price: 50 руб.
Distinguishing features of accentual-rhythmic systems in different languages are de-
termined by the specifi c combination of segmental and suprasegmental phenomena.
The comparative analysis of the segmental and prosodic elements’ interaction mecha-
nism makes it possible to reveal their combination patterns and defi ne how the suprasegmental level is predetermined by the segmental level.
Key words: suprasegmental, segmental, prosodics, rhythm, accentuation,
consonantism, vocalism.
References
1. Zubkova L. G. Printsip znaka v sisteme yazyka. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury, 2010. 752 s. (Studia philologica).
2. Isachenko A. Opyt tipologicheskogo analiza slavyanskikh yazykov // Novoe v lingvistike. Vyp. III. M., 1963. S. 106–121.
3. Katsnel’son S. D. Sravnitel’naya aktsentologiya germanskikh yazykov. M.; L., 1966. 348 s.
4. Yakobson R. O. Tipologicheskie issledovaniya i ikh vklad v sravnitel’no-istoricheskoe yazykoznanie // Novoe v lingvistike. Vyp. III. M., 1963. S. 95–105.
5. Abercrombie D. Elements of General Phonetics. Edinburgh U. P. 1967. Р. 97.
6. Hakulinen L. Suomen kielen rakenne ja kehitys. Kolmas, korjattu ja lisätty painos. Helsinki, 1968.
7. Hochmann J. R., Benavides-Varela S., Nespor M., Mehler J. Consonants and vowels: different roles in early language acquisition // Developmental Science. 2011. № 14. Р. 1445–1458.
8. Iivonen A. Finnish sentence accent and intonation / Phonetics of Russian and Finnish. General Description of Phonetic Systems. Experimental Studies on Spontaneous and Read-aloud Speech. Eds. Viola de Silva, Riikka Ullakonoja. Peter Lang, Frankfurt-am-Mein, 2009. Р. 67–73.
9. Karlsson F. Suomen kielen äänne- ja muotorakenne. Porvoo/Helsinki/Juva: WSOY, 1983.
10. Nespor M., Peña M., Mehler J. On the different roles of vowels and consonants in speech processing and language acquisition // Lingue e Linguaggio. 2003. № 2. Р. 201–227.
11. Nespor M., Shukla M., Mehler J. Sress-timed vs.syllable timed languages / Companion to Phonology. Blackwell, 2011. Р. 1147–1159.
12. Peperkamp S., Dupoux E. A typological study of stress “deafness” / Carlos Gussenhoven and Natasha Warner, eds. Laboratory Phonology 7. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2002. Р. 203–240.
13. Pike K. L. The Intonation of American English. University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor, 1945.
14. Ramus F., Nespor M., Mehler J. Correlates of Linguistic Rhythm in the Speech Signal // Cognition. 1999. № 3. Р. 265–292.
15. Roach P. On the distinction between ‘stress-timed’ and ‘syllable-timed’ languages / Linguistic Controversies (D. Crystal, Editor), London: Arnold, 1982. Р. 73–79.
16. Suomi K., Toivanen J., Ylitalo R. Finnish sound structure: Phonetics, phonology, phonotactics and prosody. Studia Humanoria Ouluensia 9. Oulu University Press, Oulu, 2008.
17. Suomi K., Toivanen J., Ylitalo R. On distinguishing stress and accent in Finnish // Lund University, Dept. of Linguistics Working Papers. 2001. № 49. Р. 152–155.
18. Wiik K. Fonetiikan perusteet. Porvoo/Helsinki/Juva, 1981.
