LoginRegistration
For instance: The Scientific Opinion
About consortium subscription Contacts
(812) 4095364 Non-commercial partnership
St. Petersburg
university
consortium

Articles

The Scientific Opinion №9 (Psycho-pedagogical and philosophy of science), 2020

THE MANIFESTATION OF CONFUCIANISM IN MODERN TEACHING IN CHINA

Zhao Zheng
Price: 0 руб.
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25807/PBH.22224378.2020.10.40.46
The paper examines the manifestation of Confucianism in modern teaching in China. 
The article analyses the deviation of the current ideas of Chinese teaching, dictated by 
new curricula, from traditional teaching. Using the Confucian concept of teaching as 
an example, the author of the paper shows the positive aspects of traditional education, 
whose abandonment is inappropriate in the modern pro-Western paradigm of Chinese 
education. The author also analyses the relationship between traditional pedagogy and 
pedagogical tradition and emphasises the distinctive features of these concepts, which 
helps to understand not only the uniqueness of national Chinese pedagogy, but also to 
study the speciBc historical factors that inꏨuenced it.
Key words: Confucius, culture, traditional pedagogy, pedagogical tradition, Confucian 
teaching method, teaching.
References
1. Ge Veysin, Yan Chun’pin. Kratkoe obsuzhdenie vzglyada Konfutsiya na obuchenie // Lyaonin: Zhurnal Lyaoninskogo pedagogicheskogo kolledzha. 1989. № 3. S. 48–52.
2. Din’ Gan. Mezhdu istoriey i real’nost’yu: teoreticheskoe obsuzhdenie obrazovatel’noy traditsii Kitaya. Pekin: Izdatel’stvo obrazovatel’noy nauki, 2002 № 7.
3. Pan Pu. Kitayskaya kul’tura i kitayskaya filosofiya. Pekin: Izdatel’stvo Mir Kitaya, 1998.
4. Khillz E. Po traditsii. Shankhay: Shankhayskiy narodnyi izdatel’skiy dom, 1991.S. 3.
5. Tsyan’ M. Ubezhdanie i navyki chteniya «Lun’ Yuy». Pekin: Delovoy izdatel’skiy dom, 2014. S. 3.
6. Tsyao Veypin. O trekh nedorazumeniyakh traditsionnoy kritiki obrazovaniya. Pekin: Izdatel’stvo obrazovatel’noy nauki, 2004. № 2. S. 6–10.
7. Chzhichzhun Yu. Issledovaniya Kitaya v usloviyakh globalizatsii // Reading. 2007. № 3. S. 3–8.
8. Chzhun Tsyutsyuan’. Za omolozhenie kitayskoy natsii. Za razvitie kazhdogo uchashchegosya — probnaya interpretatsiya «Kontura reformy uchebnoy programmy bazovogo obrazovaniya (probnaya versiya)». Shankhay: Izdatel’stvo Vostochno-Kitayskiy pedagogicheskiy universitet. 2001. S. 5.
9. Chen Lyan. Ob obrazovatel’noy traditsii // Issledovaniya po razvitiyu obrazovaniya. 2005. № 6B. S. 54–58.
10. Shvarts B. Ideologicheskiy mir drevnego Kitaya. Nankin: Narodnyi izdatel’skiy dom Tszyansu, 2004. S. 2.
11. Yan Tsilyan. Konfutsianstvo i chernila. Daosskaya traditsiya chrezvychayno polezna dlya sovremennogo prepodavaniya // Zhurnal Nankinskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta (Izdanie sotsial’nykh nauk). 2002. № 4. S. 87–94.
12. Yan Tsilyan. Putanitsa i vybor — Novaya teoriya obucheniya v 20-go veke. Tszinan’: Obrazovanie izdatel’skiy dom Shan’dun, 1995. S. 109.
Price: 0 рублей
To order