The article reveals current trends in the development of distance learning within
the national systems of higher art education in three countries: Spain, the USA and Turkey. The study also considers the question of whether distance learning is supposed to eliminate cultural barriers in order to ensure its effectiveness as a mechanism for internationalisation of the educational process. Given examples illustrate the aspects and results of successful integration of distance technologies into visual arts education. In general, a growing interest of world science in the resources of distance education and the search for optimal ways to integrate modern distance learning technologies into the traditional pedagogical model can be considered as a universal trend in the current development of arts pedagogy.
Key words: distance education, online education, art education, art.
Список литературы
1. Afacan Y. Student Experiences of Blended Learning in Interior Architecture // Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 2018, 17, pp. 399–422.
2. Alvarez D. Е-draw: a virtual collaborative environment for visual art education. 2006. 8 p. URL:
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/162b/3cbd218aad27323e36293f7f5bbcc590cb09.pdf (дата обращения: 17.07.2020).
3. Carr-Chellman A. A. The new frontier: Web-based education in U.S. culture // Global Perspectives on E-Learning: Rhetoric and Reality/ A. A. Carr-Chellman (Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2005, pp. 145–162.
4. Demirbas D., Ogut S. T. Re-Designing the Design Brief as a Digital Learning Tool with Participatory Design Approach // Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 2020, 21(1), pp. 83–100. URL: https://
dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tojde/issue/52523/690356 (дата обращения: 17.07.2020).
5. DeVries Y. E. The interactivity component of distance learning implemented in an art studio course // Education, 1996, 117(2), pp. 180–184.
6. Gursoy H. A critical look at distance education in Turkey // Global Perspectives on E-Learning: Rhetoric and Reality/ A. A. Carr-Chellman (Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2005, pp. 115–126.
7. Hansen B. Distance learning: Do online courses provide a good education // The CQ Researcher, 2001, 11(42), pp. 993–1016.
8. Lai A., Ball E. L. Students online as cultured subjects: Prolegomena to researching multicultural arts courses on the Web // Studies in Art Education, 2004, 46 (1), pp. 20–33.
9. Lobo G. P., Sбnchez C. B. Determination of ICT Competencies of Visual Arts Teachers at the Universidad del Atlбntico — Virtual and Distance Education // Athens Journal of Education, 2016, 3(1), pp. 47–66. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329038836_Determination_of_ICT_Competencies_
of_Visual_Arts_Teachers_at_the_Universidad_del_Atlantico__Virtual_and_Distance_Education (дата обращения: 18.07.2020).
10. Pektas S. T., Gurel M. O. Blended learning in design education: An analysis of students’ experiences within the disciplinary differences framework // Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2014, 30 (1), pp. 31–44.
11. Saromines-Ganne B., Leong P. The “Art” of Online Learning: Teaching Visual Art Virtually. IASTED International Conference on Computers and Advanced Technology in Education including the IASTED International Symposium on Web-Based Education, 2003, pp. 659–663. URL: http://www2.hawaii.edu/~peterleo/Electronic_Portfolio/OnlineVisualArt.pdf (дата обращения: 19.07.2020).
12. Sheldon K. E. International trends and techniques used to teach studio art courses through distance education. Master’s thesis, Greenville, East Carolina University, 2009. 111 p.
13. Sweeny R. W. Lines of sight in the “Network Society”: Stimulation, art education, and a digital visual culture // Studies in Art Education, 2004, 46(1), pp. 74–87.
