The author focuses on the discursive space “scholars – bureaucracy”, which covers the
social environment of the dissertation councils, normative documents and discursive practices of organising the activity of dissertation councils. The theoretical framework of the study is Michel Foucault’s theory on the distribution of power in the society through discursive practices. The author comes to the conclusion that under the continuing hegemony of power over knowledge, intellectuals have an extremely limited choice in fulตlling their potential. Importantly, the university community widely applies simulation practices of academic activity. It should also be noted that dissertation councils require more young and active scholars. The author sees the way out of the “state of simulation” in deconstructing the existing discourse “from within” through creating an alternative active discourse by Russian intellectuals.
Key words: intellectuals, discourse, intellectual discourse, dissertation councils.
References
1. Andrushchak G., Kuz’minov Ya., Yudkevich M. Menyayushchaya real’nost’: rossiyskoe vyssheye obrazovanie i akademicheskaya professiya // Budushcheye vysshego obrazovaniya i akademicheskoy professii: strany BRIK i SShA. M.: Izd. Dom VShEU, 2013. 247 s.
2. Gurtov V. A., Shchegoleva L. V. Publikatsionnaya aktivnost’ chlenov dissertatsionnykh sovetov pri vuzakh Rossii // Vyssheye obrazovanie v Rossii. M., 2014. № 8–9. S. 16−26.
3. Dubin B., Gudkov L. Intelligentsiya. Zametki o literaturno-politicheskikh illyuziyakh. SPb.: Izd-vo Ivana Limbakha, 2009. 305 s.
4. Zborovskiy G. E., Ambarova P. A. Kak prevratit’ doverie v nematerial’nyi aktiv razvitiya vysshey shkoly // Vyssheye obrazovanie v Rossii. M., 2018. T. 27, № 6. S. 96−107.
5. Klyachko T. L. Posledstviya i riski reform v rossiyskom vysshem obrazovanii. Nauchnye doklady: Obrazovanie. M.: Izdatel’skiy dom «Delo», 2017. № 17/3. 52 s.
6. Kuleshova A. V., Podvoyskiy D. G. Paradoksy publikatsionnoy aktivnosti v pole sovremennoy rossiyskoy nauki: genezis, diagnoz, trendy // Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny. M., 2018. № 4. S. 169−210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2018.4.10
7. Lavrukhin A. Intellektual v sovremennom obshchestve: Publichnaya lektsiya v galereye Ў. 20.06.2011 (g. Minsk). URL: http://ineurope.eu/tables/2011/07/07/intellektual_v_sovremennom_obshchestve/ (data
obrashcheniya: 17.07.2019)
8. Mayatskiy M. Universitet nazyvaetsya // Logos. M., 2013. № 1 (91). S. 4−17.
9. Obzor deyatel’nosti seti dissertatsionnykh sovetov v 2012 godu: analiticheskiy doklad / V. A. Gurtov, S. I. Pakhomov, I. A. Shishkanova. Petrozavodsk: Izd-vo PetrGU, 2013. 181 s.
10. Paley E. V. Sistema otnosheniy vlasti − podchineniya v universitetskom obrazovatel’nom prostranstve: tsennostnye transformatsii // Al’manakh sovremennoy nauki i obrazovaniya. Tambov, 2016. № 9 (111). S. 73–76.
11. Pakhomov S. I., Kulyamin O. V., Gurtov V. A., Pennie I. V. Dinamika tselevykh indikatorov rezul’tativnosti nauchnoy deyatel’nosti chlenov dissertatsionnykh sovetov // Vestnik Mordovskogo universiteta. Saransk, 2017. T. 27, № 4. S. 555–576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/0236-2910
12. Pakhomov S. I., Kulyamin O. V., Dmitriev G. I., Shchegoleva L. V. Otsenka nauchnogo potentsiala vuzov v razreze grupp nauchnykh spetsial’nostey pri optimizatsii seti dissertatsionnykh sovetov // Informatizatsiya obrazovaniya i nauki. M., 2018. № 2 (38). S. 85−98.
13. Pereverzev E. Kritika KDA: nekotorye ogranicheniya kriticheskogo diskurs-analiza kak nauchnogo podkhoda // Sovremennyi diskurs-analiz. Belgorod, 2009. T. 1, vyp. 1. URL: http://www.discourseanalysis.org/ada1/st2.shtml (data obrashcheniya: 17.07.2019).
