P. N. Vinogradov, O. G. Parkhomenko, P. A. Yarkin, I. A. Yefimova
Price: 50 руб.
The paper describes the results of the empirical research on teenagers’ choice of moral
position in interaction with natural objects. The investigation is based on the ideas about
the moral character of the relationships between man and nature and the importance of
choosing the ethical grounds in social-nature interaction. The authors note the leading
role of values in forming readiness for optimal ecological activities. The authors also
reveal the characteristics of the consumer attitude and saving attitude of man towards
nature and characterise the two corresponding groups of teenagers. Based on the factor
analysis over the results of the two samples, their content and structure are determined.
Key words: ecological conscience, attitude to nature, moral choice, values, consumer
attitude, saving attitude.
References
1. Vinogradov P. N. Ekologicheskoe mirovozzrenie kak tsennost’ // Chelovek i tsennosti v XXI veke. Materialy mezhdunarodnogo seminara. SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgskiy blagotvoritel’nyi fond «Istinnaya pomoshch’ lyudyam», 2002. S. 30–41.
2. Vinogradov P. N., Kirillov P. N. Ekologicheskie orientatsii kak kategoriya ekologicheskoy psikhologii // Yezhegodnik Rossiyskogo psikhologicheskogo obshchestva. Materialy 3 Vserossiyskogo s’yezda psikhologov. SPb.: Izdatel’stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2003. S. 113–117.
3. Vinogradov P. N., Yefimova I. A. Sootnoshenie ekologicheskikh ustanovok i tsennostey podrostkov // Integrativnyi podkhod k psikhologii cheloveka i sotsial’nomu vzaimodeystviyu lyudey: vektory razvitiya sovremennoy psikhologicheskoy nauki. Materialy VII Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, SPb.: izd-vo RGPU im. A. I. Gertsena, 2017. S. 40–47.
4. Danilov-Danil’yan V. I. O psikhologicheskikh aspektakh okhrany okruzhayushcheĭ sredy // 2-ya Rossiĭskaya konferentsiya po ekologicheskoĭ psikhologii. M. Samara: Izd-vo MGPPI, 2001. S. 9–11.
5. Deklaratsiya tysyacheletiya Organizatsii Ob’yedinennykh Natsiy. – Prinyata rezolyutsiey 55/2 General’noy Assamblei ot 8 sentyabrya 2000 goda. URL: https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/ declarations/summitdecl.shtml (data obrashcheniya 19.11.2019).
6. Deryabo S. D. Prirodnyi ob’yekt kak «znachimyi drugoy». Daugavpils: Saule, 1995. 172 s.
7. Zhuravlev A. L. Aktual’nye problemy sotsial’no orientirovannykh otrasley psikhologii. M.: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2011. 560 s.
8. Zakharov V. M., Trofimov I. E. Ekologiya segodnya. Ekologiya kak mirovozzrenie. Chelovek i priroda. M.: Departament prirodopol’zovaniya i okhrany okruzhayushchey sredy goroda Moskvy / Tsentr ustoychivogo razvitiya i zdorov’ya sredy IBR RAN / Tsentr ekologicheskoy politiki Rossii, 2015. 106 s.
9. Kirillov P. N., Yarkin P. A. Detskaya ekologicheskaya skazka kak otrazhenie kollektivnogo ekologicheskogo soznaniya // Ekopsikhologicheskie issledovaniya–2 k 15-letiyu laboratorii ekopsikhologii razvitiya. M.: Nestor-Istoriya, 2011. S. 126–139.
10. Leont’yev D. A, Ovchinnikova E. Yu., Rasskazova E. I., Fam A. Kh. Psikhologiya vybora. M.: Smysl, 2015. 464 s.
11. Mamedov N. M. Kul’tura, ekologiya, obrazovanie. M.: REFIA, 1996. 52s.
12. Medvedev V. I., Aldasheva A. A. Ekologicheskoe soznanie: Uchebnoe posobie M.: Logos, 2001. 384 s.
13. Moiseyev N. N. Modeli ekologii i evolyutsii. M.: Znanie, 1983. 64 s.
14. Panov V. I. Vzaimosvyaz’ mezhlichnostnykh otnosheniy i ekopsikhologicheskikh tipov vzaimodeystviya // Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. 2012. T. 14. № 2–5. S. 1219–1227.
15. Serikov V. V. Lichnostno-razvivayushcheye obrazovanie: mify i real’nost’ // Pedagogika. 2007, № 10. S. 5–9.
16. Chudnovskiy V. E. Smysl zhizni: nekotorye itogi i perspektivy issledovaniya // Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal, tom 36, № 1, s. 5–19.
17. Yasvin V. A. Psikhologiya otnosheniya k prirode. M.: Smysl, 2000. 456 s.
