The article deals with basic statements concerning biopower and biopolitics. It poses
a question on the possibility of speaking about the age of biopolitics. Analysing the conceptual framework of this phenomenon, the author states that biopolitics is not a
separate epoch, biopolitics aspires to epoch-making, but cannot reach it.
Key words: Michel Foucault, biopolitics, population, security, massification, subject, nothing.
References
1. Batay Zh. «Proklyataya chast›»: sakral›naya sotsiologiya / per. s fr.; sost. S. N. Zenkin. M.: Ladomir, 2006. 742 s.
2. Debor G. Obshchestvo spektaklya / per. s fr. A. Urinovskogo. M.: Opustoshitel’, 2012. 177 s.
3. Delez Zh. Peregovory. 1972–1990 / per. s fr. V. Yu. Bystrova. SPb.: Nauka, 2004. 235 s.
4. Zhizhek S. O nasilii / per. s angl. Smirnov A., Lyamina E. M.: Evropa, 2010. 184 s.
5. Fuko M. Bezopasnost’. Territoriya, Naselenie: kurs lektsiy, prochitannykh v Kollezh de Frans v 1977–1978 uchebnom godu / per. s fr. N. V. Suslova, A. V. Shestakova, V. Yu. Bystrova. SPb.: Nauka, 2011. 544 s.
6. Fuko M. Germenevtika sub’ekta: kurs lektsiy, prochitannykh k Kollezh de Frans v 1981–1982 uchebnom godu / per. s fr. A. G. Pogonyaylo. SPb.: Nauka, 2007. 677 s.
7. Fuko M. Nuzhno zashchishchat’ obshchestvo: kurs lektsiy, prochitannykh v Kollezh do Frans v 1975–1976 uchebnom godu / per. s fr. E. A. Samarskoy. SPb.: Nauka, 2005. 312 s.
8. Khart M., Negri A. Imperiya / per. s angl. pod red. G. V. Kaminskoy. M.: Praksis, 2004. 440 s.
9. Chernyakov A. G. Ontologiya vremeni. Bytie i vremya v filosofii Aristotelya, Gusserlya, Khaydeggera. SPb.: Vysshaya religiozno-filosofskaya shkola, 2001. 460 s.
