LoginRegistration
For instance: The Scientific Opinion
About consortium subscription Contacts
(812) 4095364 Non-commercial partnership
St. Petersburg
university
consortium

Articles

Humanities and Science University Journal № 49 (Philology and Archaeology, World History, Art History), 2019

SELF-REGULATION IN THE COGNITIVE SYSTEM OF PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOUR

A. Yu. Chernov
Price: 50 руб.
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25807/PBH.22224378.2019.11.25.32
Cognitive theories of reflective self-awareness consider self-regulation as an interaction of the social information system and the system of cognitive organisation of an individual. The semantic segment is a link between the system of social information and the system of cognitive organisation, providing processes of self-regulation of prosocial behaviour. Cognitive patterns of prosocial behaviour are activated when interacting with the semantic segment of self-regulation. The qualitative study showed that the semantic segment of the system of cognitive self-regulation of prosocial behaviour is represented by the three elements: the level of involvement in the situation, the degree of normativity of prosocial behaviour, and assessment of the resources that a person possesses to provide assistance. In the mechanism of self-regulation of prosocial behaviour, the semantic segment is a tool for resolving the intrapsychic conflict and maintaining prosocial motivation.
Key words: self-regulation of prosocial behaviour, semantic segment of selfregulation, level of involvement in the situation, degree of normativity of prosocial behaviour, resource assessment.
References
1. Il’in E. P. Psikhologiya pomoshchi. Al’truizm, egoizm, empatiya. SPb.: Piter, 2013. 304 s.
2. Kukhtova N. V. Fenomen prosotsial’nogo povedeniya v psikhologicheskoy nauke (nekotorye podkhody v izuchenii prosotsial’nogo povedeniya) // Belorusskiy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal. 2004. № 1. S. 60–65.
3. Molchanova N. V. Prosotsial’noe povedenie kak uslovie mezhkul’turnogo vzaimodeystviya // Izvestiya Sarat. un-ta. Novaya ser. Ser. Akmeologiya obrazovaniya. Psikhologiya razvitiya. 2013. T. 2, vyp. 1(5). S. 3–6, 11.
4. Smyk Yu. V. Sotsial’nye ustanovki yunoshey i devushek v otnoshenii prosotsial’nogo povedeniya. Mir nauki. Pedagogika i psikhologiya = World of Science. Pedagogy and psychology 2019, № 4, T. 7. 2019. № 4, Vol 7.
5. Khvostov A. A. Moral’noe soznanie lichnosti: struktura, genezis, determinanty. M.: Prometey, 2005. 471 s.
6. Arndt J., Landau M. J., Vail III K. E., Vess M. An edifice for enduring personal value: A terror management perspective on the human quest for multilevel meaning / In K. D. Markman, T. Proulx, M. J. Lindberg (Eds.) The psychology of meaning. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2013. Р. 49–69.
7. Bargh J. A., Torn M. E. Context-dependent automatic processing in depression: Accessibility of negative constructs with regard to self but not other // Journal of Personality and social psychology. 1988. № 54. Р. 925–939.
8. Clarke D. J. Pro-Social and Anti-Social Behaviour. Routledge: New York, 2003. Р. 18.
9. Clarke D. J. Social influence In M. Cardwell, L. Clark and C. Meldrum (eds), Psychology for A Level. London: Harper Collins, 1996. Р. 128–176.
10. Heintzelman S. J., King L. A. (The feeling of) meaning-as information // Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2016. № 18. Р. 153–167.
11. Kanfer F. H., Hagerman S. The Role of Self-Regulation / In Lynn P. Prehm (Ed.), Behavior Therapy for Depression. New York: Academic Press, 1981. Р. 143–179.
12. Kernis M. H., Abend T. A., Goldman B. M., Shrira I., Paradise A. N., Hampton, C. Self-serving responses arising from discrepancies between explicit and implicit self-esteem // Self and Identity. 2005. № 4. Р. 311–330.
13. Lapsley K. Moral Psychology. Westview Press: Boulder, 1996. P. 166.
14. Latané B. and Darley J. M. Help in a crisis: bystander response in an emergencyIn J.W. Thibaut and J.T. Spence (eds), Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press, 1976. Р. 76–98.
15. Lyn C., Mandinach E.B. The Role of Cognitive Engagement in Classroom Learning and Motivation // Educational Psychologist. 1983. № 18. Р. 88–108.
16. MacKenzie M. J., Baumeister R. F. Meaning in life: Nature, needs and Myths / In A. Batthyany, P. Russo-Netzer (Eds.), Meaning in positive and existential psychology. New York, NY: Springer, 2014. Р. 25–37.
17. Markus H. Self-schemata and processing information about the self // Journal of personality and social psychology. 1977. № 35. Рp. 63–78.
18. Park C. L. (2010). Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events // Psychological Bulletin. 2010. № 136. Р. 257–301.
19. Rhodewelt B. Peterson The Self and Social Behavior. The Fragile Self and Interpersonal Self-Regulation / F. Rhodewelt, B. Peterson Personality and Social Behavior. Psychology Press, New York. 2008. Р. 48–54.
20. Sonnentag S. Psychological Management of Individual Performance. Wiley: New York, 2002. P. 416.
21. Stirling J. Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research // Qualitative Research. 2001. Vol. 1(3). Р. 385–405.
22. Wyer R. S., Srull T. K. Handbook of social Cognition. Vol. 1. Hillsdale: NJ, 1994. P. 492.
Price: 50 рублей
To order