The paper discusses modern projects in the fi eld of choreography, which are interrelated with art museums. It is this creative, largely subjective, controversial dialogue between the museum and dance, accompanied by the comments of art historians, choreographers, artists, that is considered in the material presented. Using the creative analysis of the modern experience of dance practices, it is possible to determine those principles and trends that are destined to breathe new life into the museum space. The examples of organizing a museum space in cooperation with plasticity theater directors clearly demonstrate that modern visual strategies, associated primarily with its interactive substance, affect the museum communicative and exhibition space in different ways. The choreographic performance is analyzed as part of a diverse event in the territory of the cultural and historical museum complex; the inclusion of dance in the dynamics of the museum’s interior spaces; integration of the choreographic performance, theatrical performances into the exhibition space; invitation by the museum of artists, choreographic schools and studios to conduct regular classes and master classes within the museum to popularize its collections, and other examples of interaction between the dance and the art museum. Relying mainly on the national experience in using museums, the author assesses main trends of the choreographic activity, which can be mutually transformed so that the museum and dance function successfully in the modern conditions and build a new communicative space with the audience.
REFERENCES
1. Arzhanukhina V. V. Teatral’nye priemy i sredstva vyrazitel’nosti kak elementy
muzeynoy kommunikatsii // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta
kul’tury i iskusstv. 2012. № 5 (49). S. 134–138.
2. Bel’kova L. V. Formirovanie etnokul’turnogo prostranstva v sovremennom sotsi-
ume // Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya. 2010. № 6. Ch. 2. S. 169–171.
3. Giniyatova E. V., Royz E. E. Transformatsiya muzeynogo prostranstva v uslovi-
yakh novykh vizual’nykh strategiy // Izvestiya Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo univer-
siteta. 2013. T. 323. № 6. S. 298.
4. Kal’nitskaya E. Ya. Teatral’naya rezhissura kak metod dizaynerskogo proekti-
rovaniya muzeynogo prostranstva // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta.
Iskusstvovedenie. 2018. T. 8. № 3. S. 480–507.
5. Karamanov A. V. Organizatsiya personal’noy virtual’noy sredy obucheniya dlya
studentov v muzeye: vozmozhnosti i perspektivy // Voprosy muzeologii. 2017. № 1 (15).
S. 105–113.
6. Kryazhevskikh M. Yu. Model’ kommunikatsionnogo prostranstva muzeya //
Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2012. № 4 (258). Filosofi ya.
Sotsiologiya. Kul’turologiya. Vyp. 23. S. 65.
7. Kulyamzina S. V. Muzeynyi spektakl’ kak forma kul’turnogo vzaimodeystviya s
posetitelem // Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya. 2009. № 5. S. 114–118.
8. Panicheva N. N. Integratsiya iskusstv v ramkakh realizatsii programmy
dopolnitel’nogo obrazovaniya «Muzeynye marshruty» // Molodye uchenye —
stolichnomu obrazovaniyu: materialy IX nauchno-prakticheskoy mezhvuzovskoy
konferentsii molodykh uchenykh i studentov uchrezhdeniy vysshego i srednego obra-
zovaniya gorodskogo podchineniya / red. V. V. Rubtsov, Yu. M. Zabrodin, A. A. Mar-
golis i dr. M.: Moskovskiy gorodskoy psikhologo-pedagogicheskiy universitet, 2010.
S. 68–70.
9. Portnova T. V. Teatral’nye ekspozitsii mira i puti issledovaniya baletnogo nasle-
diya // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul’tury i iskusstv. 2017.
№ 4 (78). S. 110–121.
10. Pushkaryov V. G. Teatralizatsiya fol’klora kak «dramaticheskaya» sostavlyay-
ushchaya ekspozitsii muzeya // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta
kul’tury i iskusstv. 2007. № 4. S. 84–87.
11. Radvil N. I. «Dialog» s podlinnikom v muzeye iskusstv // Iskusstvo v shkole.
2007. № 3. S. 46–47.
12. Rezhisser Yuriy Kvyatkovskiy: Abstraktnoe iskusstvo prekrasno tem, chto
kazhdyi chuvstvuet ego po-svoemu. URL: https://snob.ru/selected/entry/109681 (data
obrashcheniya: 08.08.2019).
13. Severin V. D. Vystavochnyi dizayn v kommunikativnom prostranstve sovremen-
nogo iskusstva // Vestnik Khar’kovskoy Gosudarstvennoy akademii dizayna i iskusstv.
2015. № 1. S. 41–44.
14. Sergey Sapozhnikov. DANCE. URL: http://www.mmoma.ru/exhibitions/gogo-
levsky10/sergej_sapozhnikov_dance/ (data obrashcheniya: 08.08.2019).
15. Timofeyeva A. L. Teatralizovannye muzeynye programmy kak faktor prezentatsii
natsional’nogo kul’turnogo naslediya regiona // Traditsionnaya narodnaya kul’tura kak
deystvennoe sredstvo patrioticheskogo vospitaniya i formirovaniya mezhnatsional’nykh
otnosheniy: sbornik nauchnykh trudov / red. Yu. V. Anokhina. Barnaul: Barnaul’skiy
yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii. 2017. 278 s.
16. Chuvilova I. V. Aktualizatsiya istoriko-kul’turnogo naslediya i sokhranenie
identichnosti: muzeynye resheniya // Gumanitarnye nauki v Sibiri. 2017. T. 24. № 1.
S. 81–85.
17. Bishop С. The Perils and Possibilities of Dance in the Museum: Tate, MoMA,
and Whitney // Dance Research Journal. 2014. Vol. 46. N 3. Special Issue: Dance in the
Museum (December 2014). P. 63–76.
18. Franko М., Lepecki А. Editor’s Note: Dance in the Museum // Dance Research
Journal. 2014. Vol. 46. Nо 3. Special Issue: Dance in the Museum (December 2014).
P. 1–4.
19. Schupp K. Dance Competition Culture and Commercial Dance: Intertwined
Aesthetics, Values, and Practices // Journal of Dance Education. 2019. Vol. 19. Nо 2.
P. 58–67.
