A. E. Makhovikov
Price: 50 руб.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25807/PBH.22224378.2018.10.53.57
The purpose of this study is to analyse one of the fundamental causes of the crisis in the
development of the modern global technological civilisation – a person that becomes the
own and only possible identiBcation of human existence in the system of civilisational
values under consideration. In the context of this understanding, a person acquires the
status of a worldview universal and an ontological basis in understanding the human
essence, and therefore it becomes the most important civilisational value, in accordance
with which each person turns into an independent universe, into a self-sufBcient whole
that has a substantive basis in itself and therefore opposes everything as another whole.
In accordance with this ideological paradigm, a personality gives himself/herself a right
to change and transform the entire world, society and even himself/herself as an object
of his/her activity. At the same time, a person transforms already existing moral criteria
and independently determines new moral criteria in the evaluation of the results of this
activity. Under these conditions, the violation of the harmonious unity of a person and
the world around becomes no longer relevant for a person, since personal attention and
satisfaction of his/her needs now deserve more attention.
Key words: man, personality, civilisational identity, worldview, world outlook
universal, universe, civilisational value.
References
1. Karsavin L. P. O lichnosti // Religiozno-Blosofskie sochineniya. M.: Renessans, 1992. T. 1. 325 s.
2. Losev A. F. Estetika Vozrozhdeniya. M.: Mysl’, 1982. 623 s.
3. Mamardashvili M. K. Vvedenie v BlosoByu // Neobkhodimost’ sebya: Lektsii. Stat’i. Filosofskie zametki / pod obshch. red. Yu. P. Senokosova. M.: Labirint, 1996. 432 s.
4. Mariten Zh. Integral’nyi gumanizm // Filosof v mire / per. s fr., poslesl., komment. B. L. Gubmana. M.: Vyssh. shk., 1994. 192 s.
5. Motroshilova N. M. Poznanie i obshchestvo (Iz istorii BlosoBi XVII–XVIII vekov). M.: Mysl’, 1969. 297 s.
6. Stepin V. S. FilosoBya i obrazy budushchego // Voprosy BlosoBi. 1994. № 6. S. 10–21.
7. Stepin V. S. FilosoBya i epokha tsivilizatsionnykh peremen // Voprosy BlosoBi. 2006. № 2. S. 16–26.
8. Strel’tsova G. Ya. Barokko i klassitsizm. 17 vek // Chelovek: Mysliteli proshlogo i nastoyashchego o ego zhizni, smerti i bessmertii. Drevniy mir — epokha Prosveshcheniya / redkol.: I. T. Frolov i dr.; sost. P. S. Gurevich. M.: Politizdat, 1991. 464 s.
9. «Chelovek-lichnost’» kak mirovozzrencheskiy proekt v osnovanii tekhnogennoy tsivilizatsii Zapada // Tsennosti i smysly. 2016. № 1. S. 63–71.
10. Shiller F. O gratsii i dostoinstve, 1793 // Sobr. soch. v 7 t. M.: GIKhL, 1957. T. 6. 458 s.
