I. E. Yegorychev
Price: 50 руб.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25807/PBH.22224378.2018.10.11.18
The author based his work on the conviction that the adjoint situation is one of
the fundamentals in the category theory. The surprisingly deep insight of the
prominent mathematician William Lawvere that all logical operations should arise
as adjunction to some basic functors between categories convinced the mathematic
community that categorial analysis of logic might be fruitful and correct. In this article,
this analysis is applied to existential and universal logical quantifiers.
Key words: category theory, categorial analysis of logic, adjoint situation, logic
quantifiers, context.
References
1. Awodey S. Category theory. N.Y. Oxford, 2010.
2. Carnap R. Logical Syntax of Language. London, Routledge, 2000.
3. Goldblatt R. Topoi. The categorial analysis of logic. N.Y. Dover Publications Inc. 2006.
4. Johnstone P. The Sketches of The Elephant. Vol.2, Part D. Toposes as theories. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2002.
5. Lawvere F. W. Adjointness in Foundations, Dialectica, 23: 281–295.
6. Lawvere F. W. Tools for the advancement of objective logic: closed categories and toposes. 56 р.
7. Lawvere F. W. & Rosebrugh R. 2003, Sets for Mathematics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Lawvere F. W. & Schanuel S. 1997, Conceptual Mathematics: A First Introduction to Categories, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Leinster T. Basic Category Theory. UK, Cambridge University Press, 1994
10. Mac Lane, Saunders. Categories for the Working Mathematician. N. Y., Springer, 1978.
11. Marquis J.-P. & Reyes G. 2012, “The History of Categorical Logic: 1963–1977”, Handbook of the History of Logic, Vol. 6, D. Gabbay & J. Woods, eds., Amsterdam: Elsevier, 689–800.
