T. V. Letuta
Price: 50 руб.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25807/PBH.25419838.2018.4.12.19
Based on the system analysis of legislation, local acts of Russian and foreign arbitra-
tion institutions, the author of the paper reveals features of the civil legal capacity of a
permanent arbitration institution and arbitrators. The main confl icts and gaps in the legal
regulation of the activities of a permanent arbitration institution and arbitrators are iden-
tifi ed. The conclusions regarding the possible optimisation of the legislation consist in
the need to divide organisational functions (challenge, appointment of arbitrators, arbi-
tration fees) and offi ce work functions in Russian arbitration institutions. Other options
are proposed for organising the activities of entities related to arbitration, which include
the need to confer the status of a legal entity on the entity administering the arbitration.
The article also raises the problems of determining the rights and duties of arbitrators as
persons engaged in resolving a dispute from the point of view of civil law. The author
notes the inconsistency in the rules on the responsibility of arbitrators, as well as prob-
lems arising in making a decision and problems of its legitimation.
Key words: civil legal capacity, permanent arbitration institution, arbitrator, arbitra-
tion, legitimation of an arbitral decision.
References
1. Arbitrazhnyi reglament arbitrazhnogo tsentra pri ANO «ISA». URL: http://www.centerarbitr.ru/fi les/
arbitrage/Arbitration_Center_Rules_2017_ru.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 02.11.2018).
2. Gimazova E. N. Grazhdansko-pravovye sredstva obespecheniya treteyskoy zashchity sub’yektivnykh
grazhdanskikh prav: avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Kazan’. 2007. 26 s.
3. Dolinskaya V. V. Problemy pravovogo statusa treteyskogo suda i postoyanno deystvuyushchikh arbi-
trazhnykh uchrezhdeniy // Zakony Rossii. Opyt. Analiz. Praktika. M.: BukovoVed, 2017. № 4. S. 7—18.
4. Zaytsev A. I. Treteyskoe sudoproizvodstvo Rossii (problemnye aspekty): avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk.
Saratov. 2004. 26 s.
5. Letuta T. V. Ponyatie, pravovaya priroda treteyskogo suda // Vestnik Universiteta im. O. E. Kutafi na
(MGYuA). 2016. № 10. S. 76—83.
6. Ob utverzhdenii Reglamenta Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii: postanovlenie Plenuma Verk-
hovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 07 avgusta 2014 g. № 2. URL: http://www.supcourt.ru/about/info/
documents_regulations/15366/ (data obrashcheniya: 23.11.2018).
7. O Verkhovnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii: federal’nyi konstitutsionnyi zakon ot 05.02.2014 g.
№ 3-FKZ. URL: http://kremlin.ru/acts/bank/38109 (data obrashcheniya: 23.11.2018).
8. O mezhdunarodnom kommercheskom arbitrazhe: federal’nyi zakon RF ot 07.07.1993 g. № 5338-1.
URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_2303/ (data obrashcheniya: 02.11.2018).
9. O Sudebnom departamente pri Verkhovnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii: federal’nyi zakon ot
08.01.1998 g. № 7-FZ. URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/11863 (data obrashcheniya: 23.11.2018).
10. Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 29.02.2016 g. № 309-ES15-12928 po delu
№ A71-15240/2014. URL: http://ras.arbitr.ru/ (data obrashcheniya: 23.11.2018).
11. Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 14.06.2017 g. № 305-ES17-2111 po delu
№ A40-157710/2016. URL: http://ras.arbitr.ru/ (data obrashcheniya: 23.11.2018).
12. Opredelenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Stavropol’skogo kraya ot 12.05.2017 g. po delu № A63-16857/2016.
URL: http://ras.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 23.11.2018).
13. Polozhenie ob arbitrazhnom tsentre pri ANO «ISA». URL: http://www.centerarbitr.ru/fi les/Polozhe-
nie_ob_Arbitrazhnom_centre.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 23.11.2018).
14. Postanovlenie Prezidiuma VAS RF № 9807/11 ot 13.02.2011. URL: http://www.arbitr.ru/as/pract/
post_pres/1_1_fd93c8e7-1c44-49cd-a638-185a33e06c9e.html (data obrashcheniya: 23.11.2018).
15. Treteyskiy sud pri mezhbankovskom fi nansovom dome / pod red. G. A. Tosunyana. M.: MFD, 1994.
47 s.
16. Treteyskiy sud. Zakonodatel’stvo, praktika, kommentarii / sost. i avtor kommentariev E. A. Vinogra-
dova. M.: Ifra-M, 1997. 685 s.
17. Tsyganova E. M. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya organizatsii i deyatel’nosti kommercheskikh
treteyskikh sudov v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Omsk, 2006. 206 s.
18. Arbitration Rules. 2017. International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). URL: https://cdn.iccwbo.org/
content/uploads/sites/3/2017/01/ICC-2017-Arbitration-and-2014-Mediation-Rules-english-version.pdf.pdf
(data obrashcheniya: 23.11.2018).
19. Hubbuck N., Fedotova J., Astafi ev K., Suspitcyna I. The Resolution of Disputes at the London Court
of International Arbitration (LCIA): Practical Aspects (Moscow, March 21, 2014) // Russian Law Journal.
2014. Vol. 2. No. 2. P. 168—175.
20. LCIA Arbitration Rules (2014). URL: http://www.lcia.org//Dispute_Resolution_Services/lcia-arbi-
tration-rules-2014.aspx (data obrashcheniya: 23.11.2018).
21. Legal status of AICAC. URL: http://court-inter.us/Legal_status_of_the_AICAC.html (data obrash-
cheniya: 23.11.2018).
22. The Regulation “On the American International Commercial Arbitration Court”. URL: http://court-
inter.us/sites/default/fi les/users/user8/regulation_on_the_aicac.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 23.11.2018).
