S. V. Strakhova
Price: 50 руб.
Charging a prosecutor with the obligation to identify and eliminate violations of laws
by the bodies conducting preliminary investigation naturally implies that he/she is given
appropriate powers ensuring the possibility of fulfi lling these duties without obtaining
permission to execute them from the supervised bodies. It seems necessary to legislate
prosecutors’ power to study the materials of a criminal case without a motivated request.
Taking into account the norms of the current criminal procedural legislation, one of the
options for solving the problem of strengthening the legality of proof in the course of
a preliminary investigation is prosecutors’ informal approach to their professional activi-
ties and building effective models for interagency cooperation.
Key words: preliminary investigation, legality of proof, powers of a prosecutor.
References
1. Dannye sudebnoy statistiki: svodnye statisticheskie svedeniya o deyatel’nosti federal’nykh sudov obshchey yurisdiktsii i mirovykh sudey // Sayt Sudebnogo departamenta pri Verkhovnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii. URL: http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79 (data obrashcheniya: 14.02.2018).
2. Isaenko V. N. Otsenka prokurorom dokazatel’stv v dosudebnom proizvodstve // Zakonnost’. 2014. № 11. S. 34–38.
3. Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii: prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993 // SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_28399/ (data obrashcheniya:
01.02.2018).
4. Lazareva V. A. Prokuror v ugolovnom protsesse. M.: Yurayt, 2015. 295 s.
5. O nekotorykh voprosakh primeneniya sudami Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii pri osushchestvlenii pravosudiya: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 31.10.1995 № 8 (red. ot 03.03.2015) // SPS «Konsul’tantPlyus». URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_8847/ (data obrashcheniya: 03.02.2018).
6. Ob organizatsii prokurorskogo nadzora za protsessual’noy deyatel’nost’yu organov predvaritel’nogo sledstviya: prikaz General’nogo prokurora RF ot 28.12.2016 № 826 // SPS «Konsul’tantPlyus». URL: http:// www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_212081/ (data obrashcheniya:02.02.2018).
7. Pravovaya statistika: statisticheskie otchety prokuratury Respubliki Krym // Ofi tsial’nyi sayt prokuratury Respubliki Krym. URL: http://rkproc.ru/taxonomy/term/44 (data obrashcheniya: 06.02.2018).
8. Reshetova N. Yu. Analiz prichin postanovleniya sudami opravdatel’nykh prigovorov: nauchnyi doklad / N. Yu. Reshetova, E. V. Velikaya, K. V. Kamchatov. M.: Akademiya Gen. prokuratury Ros. Fed., 2017. 52 s.
9. Sostoyanie zakonnosti, pravoporyadka v Rossiyskoy Federatsii i rabota organov prokuratury. 2016 god.: informatsionno-analiticheskaya zapiska / pod obshchey red. O. S. Kapinus. M.: Akademiya Gen. prokuratury Ros. Fed., 2017. 124 s.
10. Ugolovno-protsessual’nyi kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii: zakon, kodeks ot 18.12.2001 № 174-FZ // IPP «Garant». URL: http://base.garant.ru/12125178/ (data obrashcheniya: 01.02.2018).
11. Fomin P. A. Prokurorskiy nadzor za osushchestvleniem dokazyvaniya organami predvaritel’nogo rassledovaniya (problemy primeneniya st. 75 UPK RF) // Materialy nauchno-prakticheskogo seminara «Aktual’nye voprosy osushchestvleniya prokurorskogo nadzora za protsessual’noy deyatel’nost’yu organov predvaritel’nogo sledstviya i doznaniya (Sankt-Peterburg, 10 fevralya 2016 goda) / pod obshch. red.
G. V. Shtadlera. SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgskiy yuridicheskiy institut (fi lial) Akademii General’noy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2016. S. 68–74.