LoginRegistration
For instance: Humanities and Science University Journal
About consortium subscription Contacts
(812) 4095364 Non-commercial partnership
St. Petersburg
university
consortium

Articles

Humanities and Science University Journal № 40 (Philology and Archaeology, World History, Art History), 2018

ISSUES OF PROSECUTOR’S SUPERVISION OVER COMPLIANCE WITH LEGALITY OF PROOF BY PRE-INVESTIGATION BODIES

S. V. Strakhova
Price: 50 руб.
 Charging a prosecutor with the obligation to identify and eliminate violations of laws 
by the bodies conducting preliminary investigation naturally implies that he/she is given 
appropriate powers ensuring the possibility of fulfi lling these duties without obtaining 
permission to execute them from the supervised bodies. It seems necessary to legislate 
prosecutors’ power to study the materials of a criminal case without a motivated request. 
Taking into account the norms of the current criminal procedural legislation, one of the 
options for solving the problem of strengthening the legality of proof in the course of 
a preliminary investigation is prosecutors’ informal approach to their professional activi-
ties and building effective models for interagency cooperation.
Key words: preliminary investigation, legality of proof, powers of a prosecutor. 
References
1. Dannye sudebnoy statistiki: svodnye statisticheskie svedeniya o deyatel’nosti federal’nykh sudov obshchey yurisdiktsii i mirovykh sudey // Sayt Sudebnogo departamenta pri Verkhovnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii. URL: http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79 (data obrashcheniya: 14.02.2018).
2. Isaenko V. N. Otsenka prokurorom dokazatel’stv v dosudebnom proizvodstve // Zakonnost’. 2014. № 11. S. 34–38.
3. Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii: prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993 // SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_28399/ (data obrashcheniya: 
01.02.2018).
4. Lazareva V. A. Prokuror v ugolovnom protsesse. M.: Yurayt, 2015. 295 s. 
5. O nekotorykh voprosakh primeneniya sudami Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii pri osushchestvlenii pravosudiya: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 31.10.1995 № 8 (red. ot 03.03.2015) // SPS «Konsul’tantPlyus». URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_8847/ (data obrashcheniya: 03.02.2018).
6. Ob organizatsii prokurorskogo nadzora za protsessual’noy deyatel’nost’yu organov predvaritel’nogo sledstviya: prikaz General’nogo prokurora RF ot 28.12.2016 № 826 // SPS «Konsul’tantPlyus». URL: http:// www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_212081/ (data obrashcheniya:02.02.2018).
7. Pravovaya statistika: statisticheskie otchety prokuratury Respubliki Krym // Ofi tsial’nyi sayt prokuratury Respubliki Krym. URL: http://rkproc.ru/taxonomy/term/44 (data obrashcheniya: 06.02.2018).
8. Reshetova N. Yu. Analiz prichin postanovleniya sudami opravdatel’nykh prigovorov: nauchnyi doklad / N. Yu. Reshetova, E. V. Velikaya, K. V. Kamchatov. M.: Akademiya Gen. prokuratury Ros. Fed., 2017. 52 s.
9. Sostoyanie zakonnosti, pravoporyadka v Rossiyskoy Federatsii i rabota organov prokuratury. 2016 god.: informatsionno-analiticheskaya zapiska / pod obshchey red. O. S. Kapinus. M.: Akademiya Gen. prokuratury Ros. Fed., 2017. 124 s.
10. Ugolovno-protsessual’nyi kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii: zakon, kodeks ot 18.12.2001 № 174-FZ // IPP «Garant». URL: http://base.garant.ru/12125178/ (data obrashcheniya: 01.02.2018).
11. Fomin P. A. Prokurorskiy nadzor za osushchestvleniem dokazyvaniya organami predvaritel’nogo rassledovaniya (problemy primeneniya st. 75 UPK RF) // Materialy nauchno-prakticheskogo seminara «Aktual’nye voprosy osushchestvleniya prokurorskogo nadzora za protsessual’noy deyatel’nost’yu organov predvaritel’nogo sledstviya i doznaniya (Sankt-Peterburg, 10 fevralya 2016 goda) / pod obshch. red. 
G. V. Shtadlera. SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgskiy yuridicheskiy institut (fi lial) Akademii General’noy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2016. S. 68–74.
Price: 50 рублей
To order