V. A. Abakanova

Price: 50 руб.

The article is devoted to the discussion of the modern judicial theory of knowledge.
It analyses different points of view on classical concepts, as well as trends in the development of scientifi c knowledge in forensic science. The article shows the importance of the theory of refl ection, double refl ection and advanced refl ection for forensic cognition. The author examines the role of the case study strategy, as well as the system approach in methodology. The author concludes that the main task of forensic science today is to preserve, multiply and re-think the available theoretical potential for solving urgent forensic tasks.
Key words: methodology of knowledge, theory of refl ection, theory of double
refl ection, advanced refl ection, case study strategy, system approach. 1. Aleksandrov A. S. Vvedenie v sudebnuyu lingvistiku. Nizhniy Novgorod: Nizhegorodskaya pravovaya akademiya, 2003. 409 s.
2. Anokhin P. K. Operezhayushcheye otrazhenie deystvitel’nosti // Izbrannye trudy. Filosofskie aspekty teorii funktsional’noy sistemy. M.: Nauka, 1978. S. 7–26.
3. Belkin R. S. Kriminalistika: problemy segodnyashnego dnya. M.: Norma, 2001. 240 s.
4. Vitchenko N. N. Neklassicheskaya teoriya poznaniya: strategiya case-study i metodologiya konstruktsionizma // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2005. № 2. S. 37–46.
5. Gidlevskiy A. V., Maksimenko L. A. Operezhayushcheye raznoobrazie kak mekhanizm razvitiya sistem // Dinamika sistem, mekhanizmov i mashin. 2014. № 6. S. 79–82.
6. Davletov A. A. Osnovy ugolovno-protsessual’nogo poznaniya. Yekaterinburg: Izd-vo Gumanitarnogo un-ta, 1997. 191 s.
7. Kapustin A. A. Metodologiya sistemnogo podkhoda v praktike resheniya zadach preduprezhdeniya pravonarusheniy i bor’by s prestupnost’yu v sovremennoy Rossii. SPb.: SPbGEU, 2013. 142 s.
8. Lubin A. F. Mekhanizm prestupnoy deyatel’nosti. Metodologiya kriminalisticheskogo issledovaniya. N. Novgorod: NYuI MVD Rossii, 1997. 120 s.
9. Ovchinskiy A. S., Chebotarev S. O. Matritsa prestupnosti / pod nauch. red. V. S. Ovchinskogo. M.: Norma, 2008. 101 s.
10. Sokol V. Yu. Krizis otechestvennoy kriminalistiki. Krasnodar, 2017.
11. Sokol V. Yu. Sovremennye podkhody k opredeleniyu predmeta kriminalistiki // Obshchestvo i pravo. 2009. № 2. S. 215–219.
12. Tolstolutskiy V. Yu. Issledovanie sub’yektivnogo etapa otrazheniya oznachaet smenu nauchnoy paradigmy v kriminalistike // Kriminalistika — proshloe, nastoyashcheye, budushcheye: dostizheniya i perspektivy razvitiya: mat-ly Mezhd. nauchn.-prakt. konf., priurochennoy k 60-letiyu obrazovaniya sluzhby kriminalistiki
(Moskva, 16 oktyabrya 2014 g.). M.: Akademiya Sledstvennogo komiteta RF, 2014.
13. Tolstolutskiy V. Yu. Mekhanizmy pravovogo regulirovaniya, uchityvayushchie zakonomernosti operezhayushchego otrazheniya // Problemy ispol’zovaniya i innovatsionnogo razvitiya vnutrennikh vodnykh putey v basseynakh velikikh rek. Trudy mezhd. nauchn.-promyshl. foruma. 2016. S. 105–109.
14. Tsapanova S. S. Pravookhranitel’naya sistema kak element mekhanizma gosudarstva // Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta, 2015. № 3 (36). S. 180–185.
15. Yablokov N. P. Nekotorye vzglyady na kriminalistiku kak nauku i uchebnuyu distsiplinu XXI veka // Krimіnalіstika XXI stolіttya: materіali mіzhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf., 25–26 listopada 2010 r. Kh.: Pravo, 2010.