A. S. Chakhoyan, V. I. Nazarov
Price: 50 руб.
The range of the ethno-cultural factor’s influence on socio-psychological characteristics
and behaviour of a personality involves many aspects, including his/her understanding
and realisation of a lie told to other people. The results of this investigation indicate the
general trends and specific attitude to lie and its manifestations in relation to different
groups of referents, inherent in representatives of certain ethnic groups. The psychological characteristics and situational-typological manifestations of lie are considered in the paper according to its dynamic characteristics.
Key words: lie, lie experience, attitude to lie, ethnic groups.
References
1. Sushkov I. R. Psikhologiya vzaimootnosheniy. M.: Akad. proekt; Yekaterinburg: Delovaya kniga, 1999. 448 s.
2. Trifonova S. A. Kross-kul’turnaya psikhologiya: sotsial’noe povedenie i reklamnye kommunikatsii: uchebnoe posobie. Yaroslavl’: YarGU im. P. G. Demidova, 2010. 116 s.
3. Aune R. K., Waters L. L. (1994). Cultural differences in deception: Motivations to deceive in Samoans and North Americans // International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 18. p. 159–172.
4. Mealy M., Stephan W., Urrutia C. (2007). The acceptability of lies: A comparison of Ecuadorians and Euro-Americans. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31. Р. 689–702.
5. Seiter J. S., Bruschke J., Bai B. (2002). The acceptability of deception as a function of perceiver’s culture, deceiver’s intention, and deceiver-deceived relationship. Western Journal of Communication, 66. Р. 158–180.
