A. A. Popov, P. P. Gluhov, G. M. Luppa
Price: 50 руб.
The article touches upon the organisation of transition from closed industrial educational
systems, providing students with standard knowledge, to open educational systems.
This issue is viewed through three focal points – anthropological, institutional and
organisational-administrative ones. The philosophical analysis of a person’s selfformation is provided in the article. The specifiity of this work fids itself in justifiation
of the necessity of the open educational policy, providing the transfer to a new educational mode by means of establishing modern humanitarian platforms.
Key words: humanitarian platform, competency practices, educational policy, open
education, practical thinking.
References
1. Asmolov A. G. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya i konstruirovanie mirov. M.: MPSI, 1996.
2. Asmolov A. G. Optika prosveshcheniya: sotsiokul’turnye perspektivy. M.: Prosveshchenie, 2012.
3. Genisaretskiy O. I. Prostranstva reflksivnykh sostoyaniy // Voprosy metodologii. 1999. № 1–2. S. 148–159.
4. Kumbs F. Krizis obrazovaniya v sovremennom mire. Sistemnyi analiz. M.: Progress, 1970.
5. Nikitin V. A. Ideya obrazovaniya ili soderzhanie obrazovatel’noy politiki. K.: Optima, 2004.
6. Popov A. A. Obrazovatel’nye programmy i elektivnye kursy kompetentnostnogo podkhoda. M.: LENAND, 2014.
7. Popov A. A. Otkrytoe obrazovanie: fiosofia i tekhnologii. M.: Knizhnyi dom «LIBROKOM», 2012.
8. Remorenko I. M. «Sotsial’noe partnerstvo» v obrazovanii: ponyatie i deyatel’nost’ // Novyi gorod: obrazovanie dlya izmeneniya kachestva zhizni. M., SPb.: Yugorsk, 2003. S. 37–44.
9. Fuko M. Germenevtika sub’yekta: kurs lektsiy, prochitannykh v Kolledzhe de Frans v 1981–1982 uch. godu / per. s fr. SPb.: Nauka, 2007.
10. Shchedrovitskiy G. P. Kategorii slozhnosti izyskatel’skikh rabot // Programmirovanie nauchnykh issledovaniy i razrabotok. M.: Put’, 1999. S. 147–168. (Iz arkhiva G. P. Shchedrovitskogo. T. 1.).
11. Shchedrovitskiy G. P. Pedagogika i logika: sistema pedagogicheskikh issledovaniy. M.: Kastal’, 1993.
12. Shchedrovitskiy P. G. Izmeneniya v myshlenii na rubezhe XXI stoletiya: sotsiokul’turnye vyzovy // Voprosy fiosofi. 2007. № 7. S. 36–54.
13. El’konin B. D. Identichnost’, potentsial i perspektiva cheloveka v real’nosti obrazovaniya // Ot 15-ti i starshe: Novoe pokolenie obrazovatel’nykh tekhnologiy / pod obshch. red. A. V. Sultanovoy. M.: B.i., 2006. URL: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12621542/Fil.%20i%20ped.%20samoopredeleniya%2C%20
vyp.%207.%20Ot_15_i_starshe.pdf
14. Bourdieu P. Practical reason: On the theory of action. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1998.
15. Fullan M. The new meaning of educational change. L., N.Y.: Routledge, 2007.
16. Illich I. Deschooling society. N.Y.: Harper & Row, 1971. URL: http://www.vedegylet.hu/okopolitika/Illich%20-%20Deschooling.pdf
