LoginRegistration
For instance: Humanities and Science University Journal
About consortium subscription Contacts
(812) 923 41 97 Non-commercial partnership
St. Petersburg
university
consortium
Your order
0
To the amount of:
0
руб.
Empty
View

Статьи

"The Scientific Opinion" №8-9 (Psycho-pedagogical and philosophy of science), 2016

METHODOLOGICAL SYSTEM OF FORMING METACOGNITIVE AWARENESS AS A COMPONENT OF THE INNOVATION POTENTIAL OF TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

N. A. Rasshchepkina
Price: 50 руб.
 The paper covers the methodological system of forming metacognitive awareness
as a resource of self-regulation of the innovation potential and the common cultural
competence component in terms of the Federal State Educational Standards of students
majoring in engineering and technologies. It contains a target component, a content
component, a technological component and an effiiency- assessing component.
Developmental teaching, competence and subject-oriented approaches form the
theoretical and methodological basis of this system. The content component includes
students’ ideas of their intellectual qualities, among them metacognitive ones (skills,
strategies, ability of self-regulation). The technological component is represented by
stages, mechanisms, organisational forms, methods and means of formation. Testing
of the system in studying physical chemistry showed that metacognitive awareness of
university students determined on the basis of S. A. Budassi’s modifid methods reached
a higher level of maturity due to the use of the system.
Key words: innovation potential, self-regulation, metacognitive awareness, common
cultural competences.
References
1. Karpov A. V., Skityaeva I. M. Psikhologiya metakognitivnykh protsessov lichnosti. M.: Izd-vo «Institut psikhologii RAN», 2005. 352 s.
2. Karpov A. A. Vzaimosvyazi obuchaemosti i metakognitivnykh kachestv lichnosti // Yaroslavskiy pedagogicheskiy vestnik. 2012. № 3. S. 228–235.
3. Kornilov Yu. O. O razlichiyakh metakognitsiy uchebnoy i professional’noy deyatel’nosti // Kognitivnoe obuchenie: sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy / pod red. T. Galkinoy i E. Loarera. M.: Izd-vo «Institut psikhologii RAN», 1997. S. 191–201.
4. Novikov A. M. Metodologiya uchebnoy deyatel’nosti. M.: Egves, 2005. 176 s.
5. Rasshchepkina N. A. Sub’yektno-orientirovannyi podkhod k formirovaniyu potentsiala samoopredeleniya kak komponenta innovatsionnogo potentsiala studenta // Sibirskiy pedagogicheskiy zhurnal. 2013. № 3. S. 121–127.
6. Rasshchepkina N. A. Obshchekul’turnye kompetentsii kak komponenty innovatsionnogo potentsiala studenta tekhnicheskogo vuza // Nauchnoe mnenie. 2015. № 4. S. 22–28.
7. Savin E. Yu., Fomin A. E.  Obobshchennye i predmetno-spetsifihnye metakognitivnye navyki v uchebnoy deyatel’nosti studentov // Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal. 2014. № 7 (37). URL: http://psystudy.ru.
8. Schraw G. The effect of generalized metacognitive knowledge on test performance and confience judgments // The Journal of Experimental Education. 1997. 65 (2). P. 135–146.
9. Schraw G., Crippen K.J., Hartley K. Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning // Research in Science Education. 2006. V. 36. P. 111–139.
Price: 50 рублей
To order