A. E. Radeev
Price: 50 руб.
The article defies the relation of aesthetic experience and aesthetic response. The author proposes to treat the notion of aesthetic experience through the difference of active and reactive power. This allows us to show the impossibility of reducing experience to response and to prove that aesthetic response is not a necessary component of aesthetic experience. The proposed theoretical model of active and reactive power in aesthetic experience leads to the conclusion that the main feature of it is a process of experiencing, but not response.
Key words: aesthetic experience, aesthetic appreciation, force, aesthetic response,
active and reactive.
References
1. Nansi Zh.-L. Bytie yedinichnoe mnozhestvennoe. Mn: I. Logvinov, 2004. 272 s.
2. Prozerskiy V. V. Parasemioticheskiy podkhod k sistematizatsii vidov iskusstva // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta tekhnologii i dizayna. Seriya 2: Iskusstvovedenie. Filologicheskie nauki. 2014. № 1. S. 3–8.
3. Radeyev A. E. O tom, chto znachit govorit’ «Da» (po Nitsshe i ne tol’ko) // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 17. Filosofia. Konflktologiya. Kul’turologiya. Religiovedenie. 2015. № 1. S. 140–147.
4. Shusterman R. Pragmaticheskaya estetika. Zhivaya krasota, pereosmyslenie iskusstva. M.: Kanon+, 2012. 408 s.
5. Dickie G. The Myth of the Aesthetic Attitude // American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 1 (Jan., 1964). P. 56-65.
6. Mitias M. H. What Makes An Experience Aesthetic? Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1988. 154 p.
7. Shusterman R. Somaesthetics: A Disciplinary Proposal // The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 1999. Vol. 57, No 3. P. 299–313.
8. Stolnitz J. «The Aesthetic Attitude» in the Rise of Modern Aesthetics: Again // The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Vol. 43, No. 2 (Winter, 1984). P. 205–208.
