E. A. Tyugashev
Price: 50 руб.
By analogy with the problem of demarcation of scientific knowledge, which is a traditional problem for philosophy of science, the problem of demarcation of philosophy is formulated in the paper. It is shown that the problems of demarcation of science, philosophy, religion and other types of knowledge can be solved only in social philosophy based on the principle of the unity of forms of social consciousness and social practice (social relations). In the history of philosophy and metaphilosophical reflection it is recognised that genetically, structurally and functionally philosophy is most closely related to politics. This distinguishes philosophy from religion, which is genetically related to morals, and from art, which develops in the unity with aesthetic activities and aesthetic relations. Thus, philosophy is a “political” worldview or representation of the world in the categories of politics. The author proposes to carry out the demarcation of separate fragments of philosophical knowledge through the identification with specific philosophical traditions and trends.
Key words: demarcation, philosophy, metaphilosophy, philosophy of philosophy,
specificity of philosophy, nature of philosophy.
References
1. Babitskaya O. P. Osobennosti demarkatsii yazyka nauki i iskusstva // Fundamental’nye issledovaniya. 2014. № 11. S. 2284–2288.
2. Bad’yu A. Zagadochnoe otnoshenie filosofii i politiki. M.: Institut obshchegumanitarnykh issledovaniy, 2013. 112 s.
3. Duglas M. Chistota i opasnost’: analiz predstavleniy ob oskvernenii i tabu. M.: «KANON-press-Ts», «Kuchkovo pole», 2000. 288 s.
4. Il’in V. V. Problema demarkatsii: gnoseologiya versus sotsiologiya // Regionologiya. 2013. № 4. S. 88–93.
5. Kemerov V. E. Pozitsii i puti sovremennoy sotsial’noy filosofii // Vestn. Volgogr. gos. un-ta. Ser. 7: Filosofiya. 2011. № 2. S. 28–34.
6. Kerimov T. Kh. Dekonstruktsiya // Sovremennyi filosofskiy slovar’. London i dr.: «PANPRINT», 1998. S. 229–235.
7. Kont O. Obshchiy obzor pozitivizma. M.: Knizhnyi dom «LIBROKOM», 2012. 296 s.
8. Losev A. F. Mifologiya // Filosofskaya entsiklopediya. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1964. T. 3. S. 457–467.
9. Lyubchenko V. S. Znanie v kontekste praktik. Rostov-na-Donu: Izd-vo «Pegas», 1998. 192 s.
10. Mezhuev V. M. Filosofiya — sposob cheloveka byt’ samim soboy // Filosofskoe soznanie: dramatizm obnovleniya. M.: Politizdat, 1991. S. 160–168.
11. Mezhuev V. M. Filosofiya kul’tury // Sotsiokul’turnaya antropologiya. Istoriya, teoriya i metodologiya. M.; Kirov: Akademicheskiy proekt, Kul’tura, Konstanta, 2012. S. 638–647.
12. Mikhalevskaya A. S. Problemy vzaimodeystviya i demarkatsii mifa i nauki v sovremennom obshchestve // Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Ser.: Gumanitarnye nauki. 2013. № 4. S. 269–271.
13. Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Chto takoe filosofiya? M.: Nauka, 1991. 408 s.
14. Pivovarov D. V. K kharakteristike predmeta filosofii // Sotsial’nye funktsii filosofii. Sverdlovsk: UrGU, 1981. S. 149–159.
15. Popov A. V. Magiya i nauka v kontekste demarkatsii // Filosofiya, vera, dukhovnost’: istoki, pozitsiya i tendentsii razvitiya. Voronezh: VGPU, 2008. S. 168–179.
16. Popov A. V. Demarkatsiya nauchnogo i religioznogo soznaniya: avtoref. dis. … k. filos. n. Magnitogorsk: Magnitogorskiy gos. un-t, 2008. 24 s.
17. Porus V. N. Demarkatsii problema // Entsiklopediya epistemologii i filosofii nauki. M: «Kanon «1»», ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2009. S. 167–169.
18. Problema demarkatsii nauki i teologii / otv. red. I. T. Kasavin. M.: IF RAN, 2008. 279 s.
19. Solov’yov V. S. Filosofskie nachala tsel’nogo znaniya // Sochineniya: v 2 t. M.: Mysl’, 1988. T. 2. S. 139–288.
20. Tyugashev E. A. K voprosu o tom, chto takoe filosofiya // Filosofiya nauki. Novosibirsk, 1999. № 2. S. 106–117.
21. Tyugashev E. A. Problema sistemnoy demarkatsii filosofii: sotsiogennyi podkhod // Filosofiya: istoriya i sovremennost’. 1999–2000. Novosibirsk: In-t filosofii i prava Ob’yedinennogo instituta istorii, filologii i filosofii SO RAN / Novosib. gos. un-t, 2001. S. 15–24.
22. Uledov A. K. Obshchestvennaya psikhologiya i ideologiya. M.: Mysl’, 1985. 268 s.
23. Khaydegger M. Osnovnye ponyatiya metafiziki. SPb.: «Vladimir Dal’», 2013. 591 s.
24. Shchelkunov M. D. O sotsial’no-prakticheskom podkhode k problemam struktury filosofskogo znaniya // Struktura filosofskogo znaniya. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tom. un-ta, 1986. S. 41–43.
25. Ern V. F. Bor’ba za Logos. Kul’turnoe neponimanie // Sochineniya. M.: Pravda, 1991. S. 11–296.
